Anyone want to review the Relativity Lab that I made?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter piareround
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lab Relativity Review
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a relativity lab designed to measure time dilation using GPS technology, akin to the Hafele–Keating experiment. The lab's creator seeks feedback from experts in general relativity, particularly regarding the clarity of the lab's instructions and the conceptual framework, including the twin paradox. Key issues identified include the requirement for GPS-enabled smartphones and the presence of errors in the accompanying Word document. Suggestions for improving the lab's engagement and clarity are also discussed, emphasizing the importance of understanding time dilation before addressing exceptions in relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the twin paradox in physics
  • Knowledge of GPS technology and its application in time measurement
  • Proficiency in creating and reviewing educational materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Hafele–Keating experiment and its implications for time dilation
  • Explore the twin paradox and its educational applications in physics
  • Learn about GPS technology and its role in measuring time accurately
  • Investigate best practices for creating engaging science lab instructions
USEFUL FOR

Educators in physics, curriculum developers, and anyone involved in teaching relativity concepts, particularly those looking to enhance student engagement and understanding of time dilation and general relativity.

piareround
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

Recently I have been working on my teaching degree and doing field experience. Because relativity is part of the Georgia Science standards, I had to make a relativity lab. The experiment is actually measuring time dilation using GPS in the phones similar to Hafele–Keating experiment. I was wondering...

If I uploaded the lab, would anyone who has expertise in general relativity be willing to do a informal review of it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, let's see it.
 
bcrowell said:
Sure, let's see it.

Ok here it is attached. Also Question 3 is more an open ended question to get students to at least look up the speeds of different particles or time dilation experiments. I do actually take yes for an answer on that question even though I think personally that the answer should be no.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I guess this app requires an Android phone? What do you do if your students don't have cell phones, or if they have some other kind of phone? I would like to try this myself, but I don't have that type of phone.

I guess the phone has to have GPS -- how common is that in smart phones these days?

The Word document has a lot of errors like this: "Error: Reference source not found. "

In general I had a hard time following the description of the lab. Conceptually, is it as if each phone acts like a clock, and you act out the twin paradox? But in reality I assume each phone is getting its time from the GPS satellite...? It's not obvious to me that this is really an experiment that acts out the twin paradox, if the timing isn't really being done by a clock inside the phone.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
First thanks so much for reviewing!

bcrowell said:
I guess this app requires an Android phone? What do you do if your students don't have cell phones, or if they have some other kind of phone? I would like to try this myself, but I don't have that type of phone.
In the future I am hoping that similar apps get developed on the other types of phone. However, the iphone's app that does the same thing was taken down. Most people know that app as einstein's pedometer app.

bcrowell said:
I guess the phone has to have GPS -- how common is that in smart phones these days?
Yes, its supposed to be, esle you phone would need wifi connection to find where you are. That is not very convenient while your driving to have to stop your car, connect to free wifi, then check your map app.

bcrowell said:
The Word document has a lot of errors like this: "Error: Reference source not found. "
hmm... that is odd... can you take a screenshot for me so I know which ones are acting up?

bcrowell said:
In general I had a hard time following the description of the lab. Conceptually, is it as if each phone acts like a clock, and you act out the twin paradox? But in reality I assume each phone is getting its time from the GPS satellite...? It's not obvious to me that this is really an experiment that acts out the twin paradox, if the timing isn't really being done by a clock inside the phone.
What is just the introduction that was confusing or the procedure calculations section as well?

If it was just the introduction, yes, I am working on that because honestly, I myself though that students might glaze over. I just cannot think of a good way to Engage them with learning about where the formula comes from. This is why I like you mention of the twin paradox. Do you know any descriptions or links of the twin paradox where one twin is sent away and they compare clocks at a distance?​
This experiment is similar to the twin paradox if moving twin didn't return.
The Twin Paradox, in terms of standards, is the exception (or logical contradiction) of special relativity. However, students have to understand what time dilation from special relativity is before they can understand exceptions to it. Does that make sense?​
While based based on the information from the satellite, the time is measured by the phone(s) which treat the satellite and your the rest twin as in the same co-moving "rest" frame. Figuratively, its like your twin is at rest on the satellite. Its due to the GPS's frequency standard being pre-doppler shifted to 10.22999999543 MHz instead of 10.23 MHz. I can explain this in more detail if you would like.​


Now in terms of making it less confusing, maybe I could have a longer introduction and engage them by talking about the twin paradox if the twin didn't return? Or should I talk about GPS first then talk about the time dilation formula? What do you think?
 
Last edited:
piareround said:
hmm... that is odd... can you take a screenshot for me so I know which ones are acting up?

Here's an example:

http://www.lightandmatter.com/temporary_relativity_lab_screenshot.jpg

piareround said:
The Twin Paradox, in terms of standards, is the exception (or logical contradiction) of special relativity.

This isn't quite right. The twin paradox isn't really a paradox, and it isn't an exception or a logical contradiction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Everything displays ok for me. I'm using MS Word 2007.

There appears to be a missing/misplaced part of a sentence in the introduction part:
If situations Einstein’s theory of general relativity didn’t matter, then your time dilation would also be called proper time.
I'm not a native speaker myself, but it doesn't sound like correct English.

s1 said:
Someone with a doctorate in education really needs to tell the people who write these standards that relativity begins to matter when you reach the speed of a commercial airline jet or 245m/s 550 m/s. It is one reasons why people who fly actually live on average longer. (Those milliseconds saved per day tend to add up over the years)
Why do you say that? You write yourself that the time correction for a fast-moving GPS satellite is mere 7 microseconds per day, which amounts to about a second per 40 years of continuous flight(SR correction only).
You could use this fact to tie into the twin paradox - make one twin a 'janitor' on a satellite, while the other stays on Earth. Maybe let the students calculate how much longer/shorter until retirement for the space twin.

In comment s7 you mention a 'wavelength error' of 2km. A wavelength of what?
 
Hello,

I would like to know your experiment.
Could you make it available?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K