Aperture function of Diffraction Grating

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the far-field irradiance diffraction pattern from a large diffraction grating with a specified amplitude transmission aperture function. The user acknowledges that the irradiance pattern relates to the Fourier transform of the aperture function but struggles with its complexity. Suggestions include using a cosine identity to simplify the Fourier transform into shifted Gaussian functions and integrating over the entire range from negative to positive infinity. Clarifications are sought regarding the limits of integration and the process of taking the Fourier transform. The conversation emphasizes the importance of simplifying the function for better analysis and understanding of the grating's chromatic resolving power.
makotech222
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A very large diffraction grating has an amplitude transmission aperture function A(x) = 1/2[1+cos(kx)]e^(-x^2/a^2)

a) What is the far-field irradiance diffraction pattern when a >>1/k
B) Plot the pattern
c) Using the appropriate resolving criteria, find the grating's chromatic resolving power in terms of k and a.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well i know the irradiance pattern is proportional to the Fourier transform of the aperture function, but trying to take the Fourier of that monster function is pretty hard. Putting it in mathematica gives off a much too complicated function to plot. I assume the function simplifies when a>>1/k, but I'm not sure how. I have no idea how to get the resolving power, so some help there would be nice. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you write

\cos (kx) = \frac{e^{ikx}+e^{-ikx}}{2},

then you can express the Fourier transform in terms of shifted Gaussian functions (you might want to do a coordinate rescaling to get the factors of 2\pi correct). Mathematica probably doesn't know this trick for some reason.
 
Can you clarify on how to change it to shifted Gaussian function?

Another question. Since it's not specified, what limits of integration do i take? I only assume it is -a/2 to a/2, from other examples I've seen.
 
makotech222 said:
Can you clarify on how to change it to shifted Gaussian function?

Another question. Since it's not specified, what limits of integration do i take? I only assume it is -a/2 to a/2, from other examples I've seen.

Since the grating is large, you should integrate from -\infty to \infty.

As for the shift, if the Fourier transform is

\hat{f}(\omega) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i\omega x} f(x)dx,

then the Fourier transform of e^{ikx} f(x) is

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i\omega x} e^{ikx}f(x)dx =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i(\omega-k) x} f(x)dx = \hat{f}(\omega-k).
 
Sorry, I'm still not getting it, I don't understand what I'm taking the Fourier transform of.
 
simply take the limit a-> infinity, the Gaussian part becomes constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
50
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K