Aperture function of Diffraction Grating

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a diffraction grating with a specific amplitude transmission aperture function, focusing on the far-field irradiance diffraction pattern, plotting the pattern, and determining the grating's chromatic resolving power. The subject area includes concepts from wave optics and Fourier transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the complexity of taking the Fourier transform of the aperture function and suggest that it may simplify under certain conditions. There are inquiries about the limits of integration and how to express the Fourier transform in terms of shifted Gaussian functions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on transforming the function and integrating over appropriate limits. However, there remains uncertainty among others regarding the specifics of the Fourier transform and the implications of the limits chosen.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the assumption that the integration limits could be from -a/2 to a/2, but one participant suggests integrating from -∞ to ∞ due to the size of the grating. The discussion also touches on the behavior of the Gaussian component as the parameter 'a' approaches infinity.

makotech222
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A very large diffraction grating has an amplitude transmission aperture function A(x) = 1/2[1+cos(kx)]e^(-x^2/a^2)

a) What is the far-field irradiance diffraction pattern when a >>1/k
B) Plot the pattern
c) Using the appropriate resolving criteria, find the grating's chromatic resolving power in terms of k and a.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well i know the irradiance pattern is proportional to the Fourier transform of the aperture function, but trying to take the Fourier of that monster function is pretty hard. Putting it in mathematica gives off a much too complicated function to plot. I assume the function simplifies when a>>1/k, but I'm not sure how. I have no idea how to get the resolving power, so some help there would be nice. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you write

\cos (kx) = \frac{e^{ikx}+e^{-ikx}}{2},

then you can express the Fourier transform in terms of shifted Gaussian functions (you might want to do a coordinate rescaling to get the factors of 2\pi correct). Mathematica probably doesn't know this trick for some reason.
 
Can you clarify on how to change it to shifted Gaussian function?

Another question. Since it's not specified, what limits of integration do i take? I only assume it is -a/2 to a/2, from other examples I've seen.
 
makotech222 said:
Can you clarify on how to change it to shifted Gaussian function?

Another question. Since it's not specified, what limits of integration do i take? I only assume it is -a/2 to a/2, from other examples I've seen.

Since the grating is large, you should integrate from -\infty to \infty.

As for the shift, if the Fourier transform is

\hat{f}(\omega) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i\omega x} f(x)dx,

then the Fourier transform of e^{ikx} f(x) is

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i\omega x} e^{ikx}f(x)dx =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i(\omega-k) x} f(x)dx = \hat{f}(\omega-k).
 
Sorry, I'm still not getting it, I don't understand what I'm taking the Fourier transform of.
 
simply take the limit a-> infinity, the Gaussian part becomes constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
50
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K