MHB Apostol - Continuity & Differentiabilty

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apostol Continuity
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the proof of Apostol's Theorem 5.2, specifically regarding the continuity of the function $$f^*$$ at a point c. The user seeks a formal demonstration of this continuity, initially unsure about their approach. They propose that the limit $$\lim_{x \to c} f^* (x)$$ equals $$f'(c)$$, confirming that this aligns with the definition of continuity. Another participant validates this reasoning, providing reassurance. The conversation concludes with the user expressing gratitude for the confirmation of their understanding.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I need help with the proof of Apostol Theorem 5.2.

Theorem 5.2 and its proof read as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3910
In the above proof, Apostol gives an expression or formula for $$f^*$$ and then states the following:

" ... ... Then $$f^*$$ is continuous at c ... ... "I need help with formulating a rigorous and formal demonstration that $$f^*$$ is continuous ...

Can someone please help?

Peter***EDIT***

Oh! Just had a thought regarding my question above ... ...

Presumably the demonstration I was looking for is simply the following ... ...$$ \lim_{x \to c} f^* (x) = \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x) - f(c)}{x-c} = f'(c) = f^*(c) $$

Can someone please confirm that this is correct?

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is exactly the definition of continuity so imo that is correct.
 
Siron said:
That is exactly the definition of continuity so imo that is correct.

Thanks Siron ... just needed some confidence that I was correct ... so thanks!

Peter
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K