Apparent depth of an object underwater

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the apparent depth of an object underwater using Snell's law and the approximation for small angles. The initial challenge involves finding the angles and the point along the water's surface where light exits to reach an observer's eye. After some calculations, the user arrives at a solution with the distance from the left corner being approximately 18 meters and an apparent depth of about 0.19 meters. The final confirmation indicates that the calculations are correct. This highlights the application of Snell's law in practical scenarios involving light refraction.
lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
A person (the arrow at the upper left of the figure) of height ##h=1.7m## is standing at the edge of a pool of water of depth ##d=1.8m## in which there is an object located at the farthest end of the pool (black ball in the figure). What is the apparent depth of this object for the person looking at the pool, i.e. what is the depth of the object observed by the person (red ball in the figure)?
Relevant Equations
##n_1 \sin(\theta_1)=n_2\sin(\theta_2)##
I would know how to solve this problem if the person had been standing pratically above of the object underwater by using Snell's law and the approximation ##\sin(\theta)\approx\tan(\theta)## fopr ##\theta## small, but in this case I don't see how to find the angles ##\theta_1## and ##\theta_2## and, above all, at what point along the surface of the water the light with come out in such a way as to reach the eye of the person. Without this last information, when I try to set up Snell's law I get (with ##x## representing the distance from the left corner at which the light comes out): ## \frac{d^2+(L-x)^2}{d'^2+(L-x)^2}=1.33^2 ## but I have too many variables.

So, I would appreciate if someone could point me twoards a viable strategy to solve this problem. Thanks
 

Attachments

  • refraction.png
    refraction.png
    9.8 KB · Views: 125
Physics news on Phys.org
Find the two angles as functions of x.
 
haruspex said:
Find the two angles as functions of x.
Thanks. I got ##x\approx 18\ m## and an apparent depth of ##d'\approx 0.19\ m##.
 
lorenz0 said:
Thanks. I got ##x\approx 18\ m## and an apparent depth of ##d'\approx 0.19\ m##.
That looks right.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top