Apparent magnitude of a light bulb

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 4K views
icedragon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the apparent magnitude of a 100W light bulb at a distance of 3 m?

[Hint: Compare with the Sun to eliminate the unknown constant in the expression relating flux density to apparent magnitude.]

. The solar luminosity is [itex]L \approx 4 \times 10^{26} W[/itex].
. The Earth-Sun distance is approximately [itex]1.5 \times 10^8 km[/itex].

Homework Equations



[itex]m-M=5log \frac{d}{10}[/itex]
[itex]m=-2.5log \frac{l}{l_{0}}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have attempted to substitute m into the equation for m-M but I do not see how that helps me eliminate the unknown constant (which I assume is [itex]l_{0}[/itex]. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello icedragon,

Welcome to Physics Forums (PF)!
icedragon said:

Homework Statement



What is the apparent magnitude of a 100W light bulb at a distance of 3 m?

[Hint: Compare with the Sun to eliminate the unknown constant in the expression relating flux density to apparent magnitude.]

. The solar luminosity is [itex]L \approx 4 \times 10^{26} W[/itex].
. The Earth-Sun distance is approximately [itex]1.5 \times 10^8 km[/itex].

Homework Equations



[itex]m-M=5log \frac{d}{10}[/itex]
Where did that formula come from? What's d and where did the '10' come from?
[itex]m=-2.5log \frac{l}{l_{0}}[/itex]
(In your equation you are using [itex]l[/itex]'s as in 'lesson'. But they should be capitol [itex]I[/itex]'s as in 'Intensity'.)

That looks right if the relative magnitude of [itex]I_0[/itex] is 0 (which is just fine for what we're doing in this problem).

The more general formula is

[tex]m_1 - m_0 = -2.5 \log \frac{I_1}{I_0}[/tex]
which you can then set [itex]m_0 = 0[/itex] if you want [itex]m_1[/itex] to be relative to 0 magnitude. But you'll still need to solve for [itex]I_0[/itex] if you wish to do that.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have attempted to substitute m into the equation for m-M but I do not see how that helps me eliminate the unknown constant (which I assume is [itex]l_{0}[/itex]. Any help would be appreciated!

If it helps, the relative magnitude of the sun is -27 (relative to magnitude 0)*. Your first step is to use that and solve for [itex]I_0[/itex].

*(See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnitude_%28astronomy%29)