Applying Castigliano's Second Theorem to Bent Beam Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter closrevolution
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying Castigliano's Second Theorem to analyze a bent beam. The key equation presented is U = 1/2*[(M^2)L]/[GIp], which calculates the energy stored in the beam. Participants seek guidance on deriving the partial derivative of U with respect to the load P and formulating expressions for moments Mx and My in relation to the beam's axes. Clarification is also requested regarding the interpretation of GIp for the two segments of the bent beam.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Castigliano's Theorems
  • Familiarity with beam bending theory
  • Knowledge of moment calculations in structural analysis
  • Basic principles of energy methods in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Castigliano's Second Theorem in structural mechanics
  • Learn about moment distribution in bent beams
  • Research the significance of the shear modulus (G) and polar moment of inertia (Ip) in beam analysis
  • Explore examples of energy methods applied to complex beam configurations
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, structural analysts, and professionals involved in mechanical design and analysis of beams will benefit from this discussion.

closrevolution
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is attached


Homework Equations


Any help on setting up the problem would be appreciated


The Attempt at a Solution


U = 1/2*[(M^2)L]/[GIp]
This equation gives the energy
Using Castigliano's 2nd Theorem I need to find the partial derivative of U with respect to P
Not sure how to go about this with the beam given
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (24).jpg
    Screenshot (24).jpg
    20.9 KB · Views: 369
Physics news on Phys.org
Thinking of the plane in which the bent beam lies as having x and y axes, can you formulate expressions for M as Mx and My in the sections parallel to Ox and Oy? How would you interpret the expression GIp for the 2 parts of the bent?
 
Not sure what you mean by Ox and Oy
G is the same for both parts of the beam but not sure for Ip


pongo38 said:
Thinking of the plane in which the bent beam lies as having x and y axes, can you formulate expressions for M as Mx and My in the sections parallel to Ox and Oy? How would you interpret the expression GIp for the 2 parts of the bent?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K