Applying Vector Cross Product Properties for (AxB).(CxD) Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the vector cross product and their application in calculating the expression \((\mathbf{A}\times\mathbf{B})\cdot(\mathbf{C}\times\mathbf{D})\). Participants are examining the validity of a specific equation presented in a textbook and exploring the necessary rules to derive it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning whether the author is solely using a specific vector identity to arrive at the equation. There are suggestions to approach the problem using component definitions of the cross and dot products, although some express concern about the complexity of this method.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts on relevant vector identities. Some have indicated that they have found a solution, while others are still exploring the implications of the rules mentioned.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential complexity in using component definitions, and some participants reflect on the necessity of certain vector identities in solving the problem. The original poster expresses uncertainty about missing key insights.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I am following along in a book and in one line the author asserts that

[tex](\mathbf{A}\times\mathbf{B})\cdot(\mathbf{C}\times\mathbf{D}) = (\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{C})(\mathbf{B}\cdot\mathbf{D}) - (\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{D})(\mathbf{B}\cdot\mathbf{C})\qquad(1)[/tex]


Homework Equations



I believe that he is somehow using the rule that

[tex]\mathbf{A}\times(\mathbf{B}\times\mathbf{C}) = \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{C}) - \mathbf{C}(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{B})\qquad(2)[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Is this the only rule he is using to arrive at (1) ?
I am having trouble see how to implement this to arrive at the same result. Am I missing something painfully obvious? :redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try to do this in terms of components, i.e. using the definition of the cross and dot product? (Didn't try it myself, only suggesting.)

Edit: although it might get a little messy...
 
Saladsamurai said:

Homework Equations



I believe that he is somehow using the rule that

[tex]\mathbf{A}\times(\mathbf{B}\times\mathbf{C}) = \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{C}) - \mathbf{C}(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{B})\qquad(2)[/tex]

I would think they'd use this formula as well as this one


[tex]A\cdot (B \times C) = B \cdot (C \times A) = C \cdot (A \times B)[/tex]
 
rock.freak667 said:
I would think they'd use this formula as well as this one


[tex]A\cdot (B \times C) = B \cdot (C \times A) = C \cdot (A \times B)[/tex]

Ah yes, totally useful :smile:. Seeing as I have, in essence, a scalar triple product I would be hard pressed to start this without that rule :redface:

I have solved it now.

Thanks again! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
908
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
13K