Approximating ln(x): Taylor Series Problem Solution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around approximating the natural logarithm function, ln(x), using a Taylor series expansion centered at 1. Participants are examining the relationship between a given Taylor series and the integral of ln(x), exploring how to derive an approximation that includes specific terms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss integrating a Taylor series to find an approximation for ln(x) and question the origin of specific terms in the approximation. There is an exploration of the constant of integration and its implications on the final expression.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on integrating polynomials and clarifying the distinction between constants of integration. Some participants express confusion about deriving specific terms, while others suggest substituting values to clarify constants.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's struggle with the problem, indicating a lack of confidence in their understanding of integration techniques. Participants are also reflecting on the assumptions made regarding constants in the integration process.

jsewell94
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The first three terms of a Taylor Series centered about 1 for ln(x) is given by:

\frac{x^{3}}{3} - \frac{3x^{2}}{2} + 3x - \frac{11}{6}

and that

\int{ln(x)dx} = xlnx - x + c

Show that an approximation of ln(x) is given by:

\frac{x^3}{12} - \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{3x}{2} - \frac{5}{6} - \frac{1}{4x}


2. The attempt at a solution
I have tried this problem a few times, but it is becoming clear that I am missing some crucial step/idea. Basically, what I have tried is setting lnx equal to the Taylor Series, integrating both sides, and solving for lnx. However, when I do this, I manage to get all of the necessary terms EXCEPT for the 1/4x. Where does that come from, exactly? If someone could help, that'd be awesome! :D

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you likely forgot the +C. C is a constant and should equal some number. What do you think that number is?
 
micromass said:
I think you likely forgot the +C. C is a constant and should equal some number. What do you think that number is?

Does c = 1 because the center is at 1?
 
Even if that is the case, I'm not sure how I would get 1/4x from that.
 
jsewell94 said:
Does c = 1 because the center is at 1?

No.

What do you get after you subsitute ln(x) with the polynomial and integrate it??
 
Please don't judge my slowness :( I'm really not bad at math. I just haven't done any of my homework, lol.
 
micromass said:
No.

What do you get after you subsitute ln(x) with the polynomial and integrate it??

After you integrate the polynomial, you get:

\frac{x^4}{12}-\frac{x^3}{2}+3x^2-\frac{11x}{6} + c

Which is what I did, and then set it equal to xln(x)-x+C

But every time I do that, I get the wrong thing :( (meaning, I don't get the 1/4x)

I feel like I'm misunderstanding the nudges that you are giving me, lol.
 
jsewell94 said:
After you integrate the polynomial, you get:

\frac{x^4}{12}-\frac{x^3}{2}+3x^2-\frac{11x}{6} + c

OK, that's good (although the middle term should be \frac{3x^2}{2})

Which is what I did, and then set it equal to xln(x)-x+C

But every time I do that, I get the wrong thing :( (meaning, I don't get the 1/4x)

I feel like I'm misunderstanding the nudges that you are giving me, lol.

What you should get is

\frac{x^4}{12}-\frac{x^3}{2}+\frac{3x^2}{2}-\frac{11x}{6} + c = x ln(x)-x+C

Yes, the constant of integration c and the other constant C are distinct in general, so you can't eliminate them! This is likely your mistake.

The above is equivalent to:

\frac{x^4}{12}-\frac{x^3}{2}+\frac{3x^2}{2}-\frac{11x}{6} = x ln(x)-x+(C-c)

Can you figure out what number C-c is?? (we're not interested in the specific values of C and c here, we just want a number instead of constants).
 
micromass said:
OK, that's good (although the middle term should be \frac{3x^2}{2})
That's what I actually got, I just mistyped it :/

micromass said:
Yes, the constant of integration c and the other constant C are distinct in general, so you can't eliminate them! This is likely your mistake.
I know :D That's why I denoted one as c and the other as C.

micromass said:
Can you figure out what number C-c is?? (we're not interested in the specific values of C and c here, we just want a number instead of constants).

This is where I am confused..Like, I'm not trying to sound annoyingly difficult, but I honestly have no idea what to do with the C-c. :( I understand that it is just some number, but I have absolutely no clue what that number is or how to get it.

My confidence in my math skills is quickly plummeting :(
 
  • #10
I mean, I assume it is 1/4, because that is what I am trying to prove. But what is the reasoning behind that?
 
  • #11
Maybe you can substitute in some value for x and see what you get??

For example, if I want to determine a constant C such that

\sin(x)=x^2+x+C

Then I can substitute in x=0 and get

0=C.

Can you do something like that to determine C-c?
 
  • #12
Wow..Oh my freaking gosh, I think I am going to go into a corner and cry. I am so stupid :(

Thanks for the help :( I got it now :(
 
  • #13
jsewell94 said:
Wow..Oh my freaking gosh, I think I am going to go into a corner and cry. I am so stupid :(

Thanks for the help :( I got it now :(

Don't worry about it. Yes, it is a trivial problem, but it's one of these things you had to see before knowing you could do that.

Instead of feeling depressed, you should feel happy because you found a new technique! I bet that next time (on a test perhaps), you won't forget how to do this! :-p
 
  • #14
That's not even a "new technique." That is basic, elementary calculus that everyone should know how to do. Plugging in a given value and solving for C is something that every Calc student learns the moment they learn integration. I am in calculus 2 and didn't even consider it.

AKA, I think my feelings of idiocy are justified :P
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K