Approximating mac/taylor series to z decimal accuracy

  • Thread starter Thread starter frozenguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy Series
frozenguy
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Any problem. Ex Use the Mac series of tan^{-1}\left(x\right) to approximate at x=\frac{1}{2} to three decimal place accuracy.

Homework Equations


\sum^{\infty}_{k=0}(-1)^{k}\frac{x^{2k+1}}{2k+1}=x-\frac{x^3}{3}+\frac{x^5}{5}-...

The Attempt at a Solution



I found out using the remainder estimation theorem that all I need is up to the fifth power. So I put x into the expanded series to the fifth power (third term) and then I take three decimal places, rounding the third.
The books answer is four decimal places, fourth rounded and an answer that comes from using the seventh power (fourth term).

So, what am I doing wrong.. I have encountered this on several problems in the book.
Am I using my remainder estimation theorem wrong?

\frac{\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{n+1}}{n+1}<0.0005Using my calculator, I find at n=5, the left side is less then 0.0005
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone able to shed some light?
 
frozenguy - Just look at the terms of the series. At what point will the next sucessive term yield precision beyond your target. That's your cut-off point.

Using the Remainder Estimation therom requires knowledge of the (n+1)th derivative of f(x), something that might be very messy for your function, and will not (in this case) help you solve for the desired value of n (unless you try several trial-by-error cases).

Also, please recall/review, the Remainder Therom is

<br /> R_{n}(x) = \frac{f^{(n+1)}(\xi)}{(n+1)!} \cdot (x-a)^{(n+1)}<br />

where \xi=\xi(x) and here a= 0.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top