Approximations used in solving for the electric field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field generated by a uniformly charged rod of length L, positioned along the z-axis, at a point x far from its midpoint. The derived formula for the electric field is E = (λL/4πεx²) in the x hat direction, which simplifies to E = (1/4πε) (Q/x²) when considering the total charge Q. The initial misunderstanding regarding the approximation of L/x leading to zero electric field is clarified, emphasizing that the L/x term remains significant for the x-dependence of the electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically limits and approximations
  • Knowledge of the concept of charge density (λ)
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the concept of limits and approximations in physics
  • Explore the use of LaTeX for formatting mathematical equations
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields in different geometries, such as point charges and dipoles
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields generated by charged objects.

AeroKaro
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose we have a rod of length L oriented on the z-axis so that the bottom end is at z= - L/2 and the top end if at z = L/2. Furthermore, the rod is uniformly charged with charge density 'λ'. Now we are interested in finding the electric field at a point x away from the midpoint of the rod. If this distance is very far away so that x>>L. What is the electric field at x?

Homework Equations


E = (λ/4πεx)*(L/√(x_squared + (L_squared/4))), in the x hat direction.
(Sorry for the mess, I'm new here and am not familiar with Latex or any other methods of typing mathematical equations).

The Attempt at a Solution


Now my intuition tells me that if x>>L, then x/L>>1 or L/x must equal about 0. I see an L/x term in my equation and if I apply the latter approximation my electric field becomes zero. If I am very, very far away from the charged rod, I shouldn't feel its effects. However, another solution I see is to factor out the x_squared from the denominator to get E = (λ/4πεx_squared)*(L/√(1 + (L_squared/4x_squared))) THEN apply the approximation to get rid of the L_squared/4x_squared term and arrive at a final answer of E = λL/4πεx_squared, in the x hat direction. What is wrong with my initial attempt?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. Nothing wrong with your initial shot: the L/x factor stays in there (after all you are looking at te x-dependence) and you get $$|E| = {\lambda L\over 4 \pi\varepsilon_0 x^2} = {1\over 4 \pi\varepsilon_0} \, {Q\over x^2} $$ just like from a simple charge at the origin -- and just like your second approach.

By the way: Hello Karo, :welcome: (in case you weren't welcomed yet).

##\LaTeX## is fun. Check out the intros. Start with ##\#\# ## a^2 + b^2 = c^2 ##\#\# ## to get ## a^2 + b^2 = c^2 ##.
Proceed with right-mouse click over an equation and "Show math as ##\TeX## commands"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K