Arc length of a circle using integration

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the arc length of a circle defined by the equation x² + y² = R² using integration techniques. Participants explore the implications of using limits of integration and the nature of functions versus relations in the context of arc length calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant derives the arc length using implicit differentiation and integration, questioning the need to multiply by two to obtain the full circumference.
  • Another participant clarifies that the limits of integration from -R to R only cover the upper half of the circle, thus necessitating the multiplication by two for the full circumference.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of functions, where one participant argues that a function can only have one value for each argument, which restricts the analysis to half the circle.
  • Participants explore the parametrization of the circle as an alternative approach, leading to a different integral that accounts for the entire circumference without ambiguity.
  • Questions arise regarding the integration of the inverse sine function and whether similar considerations about function limits apply, with some participants asserting that only functions can be integrated properly.
  • Concerns are raised about the physical meaning of integrating over limits that are outside the function's domain, with one participant expressing confusion about the implications of such calculations.
  • Another participant points out that the equation of a circle does not represent a function due to multiple y-values for a single x-value, emphasizing the need for proper parametrization or segmentation of the circle.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the domain and range of the inverse sine function, countering the notion that it has an unlimited range.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of using limits of integration for the arc length of a circle and the nature of functions versus relations. There is no consensus on the best approach to resolve these issues, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of functions and relations, as well as unresolved questions about the integration of functions outside their domains. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of mathematical principles related to integration and arc length.

Swallow
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello there,
suppose i want to find the arc length of a circle x^2+y^2=R^2 using integration, implicitly differentiating the equation, i find y'=-(x/y)

now,

arc length (circumference)= (\int \sqrt{1+y'^2}dx
putting the value of y'=-(x/y) and substituting for y^2 from the equation of the circle
(y^2= R^2-x^2)
solving, the equation i get
circumference= R*{ sin-1 [x/R] }^{a}_{b}

where a and b are the limits of integration

whats bugging me here is the limits, when i use the limits [-R,R], i get circumeference=\pi*R

now what i don't get is why do i have to multiply by two to get the actual answer, i mean i didnt use the equation of the upper/lower semicircles ANYWHERE in my calculations, shouldn't these limits be giving me the full circumference, without the need to multiply by two??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, -R to R is the interval x runs along on the--half circle.

Remember that the inverse sine function is uniquely defined only on intervals of the type 0 to pie.
 
Thanks for the quick reply arildno.

ButI still don't get it, I mean x runs along both half circles doesn't it?
both upper and lower AND our function (x^2+y^2)=R^2 accounts for both the semi circles, so shouldn't it's integral ALSO account for both half circles?
 
No.

Because a function can only have one function value for each argument value.

The graph of the full circle is not the graph of a function because for practically all x-values, there are are two y-values on the graph.

Thus, representing "y" as a function of x, you have necessarily restricted yourself to the half-circle.

You could do differently, by regarding BOTH "x" and "y" as functions of a single variable, say the angle made to the positive x-axis.

In that case, you have the parametrization:
x(t)=R\cos(t), y(t)=R\sin(t), 0\leq{t}\leq{2\pi}, R\geq{0}.

In this case, your arc-length integral becomes:

L=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\sqrt{(\frac{dx}{dt})^{2}+(\frac{dy}{dt})^{2}}dt=\int_{0}^{2\pi}Rdt=2\pi{R}
 
OK, I'm starting to get it a bit.

A function, should only have one y value for each x value, so inverse sine is a function if and only if we restrict the range (i.e.we make it the principal inverse sine function).

BUT if we consider sine inverse (the relation; which has an unlimited range), then does the fact (that a FUNCTION can only have one y value for each argument), make any difference in our ability to calculate the arc length of sine inverse (again the relation not the function) in a range of (say) -100pi to 100pi.

can we directly apply the limits in the integral (as i have applied to the circle equation) or do we have to account for the fact that sine inverse is not a function and multiply the answer by some constant (as in the case of the circle) in order to get the "real" arc length?

(If I am not wrong)we do NOT have to do anything of this sort in case if the inverse sine. Why are these two cases different/?
 
Well, you can't integrate a "relation", in your usage of the terms.
Only among functions do you find integrable fellows.
 
but supposing i integrate sine inverse the function, (i can do that can't i?)
THEN i apply the limits of integration from -100pi to 100pi (which are not Actually in the range of the function), will that give me the arc length?
 
No.
Because those values are not within the domain of your function.
 
i mean if i integrate with respect to dy. then take the limits -100pi to 100 pi, that would give an answer, what would be the physical meaning of that answer?
 
  • #10
Sigh.
you have WRONG ideas about what functions&integration are.
Go back to your texgtbolok, there is nothing further to be said on this matter.
 
  • #11
The way I see it, there are several problems with your analysis are:

1. The equation of a circle (x^2 + y^2 = R^2) is not a function in the first place because each x value maps to two separate y values. You either have to break the circle into two halves and then multiply by 2, or use the parametrization (x = R cos t, y = R sin t). To properly use the arc length formula, you have to use the parametrization.

2. You are using the substitution y^2 = R^2 - x^2. Because the arc length formula you're using integrates over dx, you are making y a function of x (y(x) = Sqrt[R^2 - x^2]) which only yields a half circle.

3. The real part of the inverse sine function doesn't have an unlimited range. Both the domain and range are bounded. The domain is [-1,1] and the range is [-Pi/2,Pi/2].



If I'm wrong, please let me know. I am by no means an expert.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K