Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Are gravitational waves relativistic or Newtonian phenomenon?

  1. Mar 17, 2014 #1
    Today, all of the scientific world (including /r/physics) buzzes about BICEP2's discovery of gravitational waves dating from Big Bang as an undispute confirmation of the general relativity. Now I wonder is it really GR? Can't it be explained by simple Newton's mechanics?
    I mean if you can explain electromagnetic waves as as a consequence of accelerating charge then sure you can expalain gravitational waves as a consequence of the accelerating mass.
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 17, 2014 #2

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Surely not. Gravitation is instantaneous in Newtonian mechanics. There is nothing in the Newtonian description of gravity that allows for gravitational waves.

    Another way to look at it: Gravitational waves represent energy lost to the universe by orbiting bodies. This doesn't happen in Newtonian mechanics, where gravitationally orbiting bodies conserve energy and angular momentum.
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2014
  4. Mar 17, 2014 #3
    Is there any intuitive analogy to the EM fields in gravity? I mean, in EM you have two fields, magnetic and electric where one's change produces other's. Is it something similar in GE?
  5. Mar 17, 2014 #4

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

  6. Mar 17, 2014 #5
    I believe I shouldn't be asking a question under another question but.... since the discovery of g waves was brought up...I didn't see the point in opening another thread. My question is this: Why is the discovery of gravitational waves being considered irrefutable proof for the theory of inflation? Are other theory's that include g waves now considered validated? (fecetious) tia
  7. Mar 17, 2014 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    EM is a relativistic theory, not a Newtonian theory. The field theory needs to predict wave equations for the fields to satisfy (e.g. in vacuum) in order for wave-like solutions to exist for the theory. EM does this but Newtonian gravity does not.
  8. Mar 18, 2014 #7
    I don't think the primary source claims anything about proving inflation, so anything to that extent is probably added by bloggers.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Are gravitational waves relativistic or Newtonian phenomenon?
  1. Gravitational waves? (Replies: 14)

  2. Gravitational Wave (Replies: 2)