Are Linearly Dependent Vectors Always a Linear Combination?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
given the vectors,

v1,v2...vk+1.
show that if v1,v2...vk+1. are dependent then v1,v2...vk+1 are definitely dependent.

can i say that in a series of dependent vectors, at least one must be a linear combination of the others therefore, if v1,v2...vk+1 are dependent, v1,v2...vk+1 must be since it contains the vector which was a linear combination (from the larger series)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dell,
I think you have written the problem incorrectly. My guess is that this is the problem:

Given the vectors, v1,v2,...,vk+1,
show that if v1,v2,...,vk+1 are linearly dependent, then v1,v2,...,vk are linearly dependent.

To answer your question, yes, in any collection of linearly dependent vectors, it must be the case that one of them is some linear combination of the rest.
 
Mark44 said:
Dell,
I think you have written the problem incorrectly. My guess is that this is the problem:

Given the vectors, v1,v2,...,vk+1,
show that if v1,v2,...,vk+1 are linearly dependent, then v1,v2,...,vk are linearly dependent.

To answer your question, yes, in any collection of linearly dependent vectors, it must be the case that one of them is some linear combination of the rest.
Huh? In R^2 the vectors (1,0), (0,1), (1,1) are linearly dependent, but (1,0) and (0,1) are linearly independent.