Are my KVLs incorrect for this circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pyroknife
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in analyzing two electrical loops in a circuit. The user presents their KVL equations for Loop 1 and Loop 2, noting discrepancies with an alternative solution. Specifically, the user questions the sign conventions used in Loop 2, where they have -30(i2-i1)+10(i2-i1)=0, while the alternative solution presents it as -30(i2-i1)-10(i2-i1)=0. The consensus among participants emphasizes the importance of sign conventions when traversing loops, particularly in relation to current direction and voltage drops.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of voltage drops and rises in electrical circuits
  • Basic concepts of current direction in loop analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Kirchhoff's Voltage Law applications in complex circuits
  • Study sign conventions in circuit analysis
  • Learn about loop analysis techniques in electrical engineering
  • Explore examples of KVL problems with varying configurations
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in circuit analysis and troubleshooting using Kirchhoff's laws.

pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4
I attached the problem. I'm writing the KVL for each separate loop. For my purposes, I will only write the first two.

i1=1st loop (one on the left) current
i2=2nd loop current (loop in the middle)

Loop 1: 12-12*i1-10(i1-i2)-6*i1=0
Loop 2: -30(i2-i1)+10(i2-i1)=0

The solutions differ with mine however that for loop 2 they have -30(i2-i1)-10(i2-i1)=0

Am I wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 363
Physics news on Phys.org
pyroknife said:
Loop 2: -30(i2-i1)+10(i2-i1)=0

The solutions differ with mine however that for loop 2 they have -30(i2-i1)-10(i2-i1)=0

Am I wrong?
I agree more with the solution version -- apart from the fact that it's (i2-i3) that goes with the 30 ohm resistor.

The way I remember it is: when traversing around the loop, when going in the same direction as the current then it's a voltage drop, therefore you get a "-" sign. When going against the current direction it's a voltage rise, and therefore you get a "+" sign.

So, if we agree that we traverse the middle loop clockwise, and the currents are all defined as clockwise as well, then it should be "-" for all the i2 terms and "+" for i1 and i3 in the middle-loop equation.

Hope that helps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K