Are Pi-Mesons and W-Bosons Truly Identical in Particle Decay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter talanum52
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of pi-mesons and W-bosons, specifically questioning whether they can be considered identical due to their decay into the same particles. Participants explore the properties of these particles and their implications in particle decay.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differences in mass and spin between pi-mesons and W-bosons, questioning the implications of their decay products. There are inquiries into the nature of decay products versus constituents and the concept of structure conservation in particle physics.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the identities of the particles in question. Some participants provide insights into the fundamental differences between the particles, while others challenge assumptions and propose personal theories.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of homework constraints, as some participants reference the need to adhere to academic guidelines while discussing personal theories, which are noted as off limits in the context of the forum.

talanum52
Messages
19
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
pi- =W-?
Relevant Equations
pi- = W- ?
They decay to identical particles but are they identical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are your own efforts in trying to answer this question?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and topsquark
talanum52 said:
Homework Statement:: pi- =W-?
Relevant Equations:: pi- = W- ?

They decay to identical particles but are they identical?
Can you list the properties of each of these particles?

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
topsquark said:
Can you list the properties of each of these particles?
They don't have the same mass and spin. Because they decay to the same particles, there must be additional particles in their decay formulas, that isn't the same, because spin is a conserved quantity.
 
talanum52 said:
They don't have the same mass and spin. Because they decay to the same particles, there must be additional particles in their decay formulas, that isn't the same, because spin is a conserved quantity.
They do, indeed, have different masses. But why do you say they have different spins? They are both spin 1 bosons.

You are looking only at decay products. What you are not looking at is the more basic stuff. Here's a brief rundown.

A ##\pi^-## is made of a pair of bound quarks: a ##\overline{u}## and a d. It has a spin of 1 and an isospin of -1, and being made of quarks participates in the strong nuclear, weak nuclear, and electromagnetic forces.

A ##W^-## is a weak gauge boson and is a fundamental particle. It has a spin of 1 and an isospin of 0. It is not made of quarks and participates in the weak nuclear and electromagnetic forces.

(Also look up weak isospin.)

The mass difference doesn't imply that there are any particles missing from the decay lists, it just means that the decays from the ##W^-## are more energetic.

So the main difference is that the ##W^-## is a fundamental weak gauge boson and the ##\pi^-## is a composite meson.

-Dan
 
The pions are pseudoscalar particles, the W-bosons vector ones. I've no clue, how one can get to the idea they were the same particles to begin with.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
vanhees71 said:
I've no clue, how one can get to the idea they were the same particles to begin with.
They decay to identical particles - that's why.
 
talanum52 said:
They decay to identical particles - that's why.
Are decay products the same as their constituents?

Neutral pion decays into two photons, is the pion composed of photons?

Note that ##\pi^-## has several decay channels, same with the ##W^-## boson.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
malawi_glenn said:
Are decay products the same as their constituents?

Neutral pion decays into two photons, is the pion composed of photons?
I'm arguing that structure is conserved. Then the neutral pion's substructures cancel (not the energy).
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
  • #10
talanum52 said:
I'm arguing that structure is conserved. Then the neutral pion's substructures cancel (not the energy).
It's an interesting idea, but it doesn't work well in practice. In fact, this example shows why you can't make this argument in general: the ##W^-## is a fundamental particle and does not have any structure to conserve. And as there are many ways in which it can decay it would be hard to say, just by looking at the daughters, what the original particle might have been before the decay. (Possible, of course, but hard.)

-Dan
 
  • #11
talanum52 said:
I'm arguing that structure is conserved. Then the neutral pion's substructures cancel (not the energy).

Define "structure"and how/why it would be conserved.

This is clearly not homework, looks more like own idea/speculation of yours.

##W^-## boson can decay into bottom quark (plus another lighter quark), ##\pi^-## can not. Case closed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and topsquark
  • #12
malawi_glenn said:
Define "structure"and how/why it would be conserved.
Structure is the quantum numbers, mass, velocity and the space points and left out points that carries it. In my model of particles. It just seems conserved because this is the most economical.

It is work at home.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy and malawi_glenn
  • #13
talanum52 said:
In my model of particles
This is personal theory, which is off limits here. Your legitimate question has been answered.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
809
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K