Are polaritons simply photons propagating in medium?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Heirot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Medium Photons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the identification of polaritons in relation to photons propagating in a medium, particularly focusing on the implications of refractive index on their properties. Participants explore the definitions and characteristics of polaritons, photons in media, and the conditions under which these terms are used, touching on theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a photon in a medium can be considered to gain mass due to the change in its momentum, proposing the term "polaritons" for such particles.
  • Another participant argues that as long as the refractive index is constant, the photon remains massless, although variations in n with frequency and wavevector can lead to an effective mass for polaritons.
  • A participant questions whether a polariton can be identified with a particle characterized by energy E and momentum p/n.
  • Concerns are raised about the definition of "polariton," noting that its usage varies across fields, particularly in semiconductor physics where it refers to strongly coupled systems.
  • One participant expresses a need for a term to describe a quasiparticle representing a photon in an optical medium, suggesting that "polariton" might be suitable, while emphasizing the importance of the refractive index n.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of "photon-like polaritons" and distinguishes them from "phonon-like" polaritons, discussing their dispersion curves and the implications of light-matter coupling.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the distinction between true photons, which exist only in vacuum, and the excitations in solids that travel at a speed of c/n.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and characteristics of polaritons and photons in media, indicating that there is no consensus on the terminology or the implications of refractive index on mass and properties.

Contextual Notes

Definitions of polaritons vary across different fields, and the discussion highlights the complexity of light-matter interactions and the conditions under which different terms are applied. The relationship between momentum, effective mass, and the nature of quasiparticles remains nuanced and unresolved.

Heirot
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
In vacuum, the photon has a 4-momentum (E, p) with E^2 - p^2 = 0, i.e. it's massless. However, upon entering a medium of refractive index n, we expect that the photon retains its energy, while reducing its momentum by a factor n (due to increased wavelength). We then have for the 4-momentum of a photon in the medium (E, p/n) with E^2 - p^2 / n^2 != 0 which implies that the photon gains mass in a medium. Would it be correct to identify this particle not as a "photon in a medium" but as a polariton?

PS I'm a particle physicist, so take it easy on me :)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as n is constant, the photon (or polariton) will still be massless. However n will vary with frequency and wavevector, so that the polariton can gain an effective mass as m_eff=d^2E/dp^2.
 
OK, so the question is, can I identify a polariton with a particle of energy E and momentum p/n?
 
Heirot said:
IWould it be correct to identify this particle not as a "photon in a medium" but as a polariton?

That question is a bit difficult to answer as the usage of the word "polariton" differs in different fields. Some fields, especially some subfields in semiconductor physics reserve the term polariton for strongly coupled systems. That means that you have strong light-matter interaction and avoided crossings when plotting the dispersions. It also means that a perturbative treatment of the light-matter interaction fails. In these fields, the term "photon" is also used in the regime of weak light-matter interaction.

However, strictly speaking a bare photon only describes the electromagnetic field in vacuum. The changes introduced by the medium can also always be described in terms of polaritons. Some fields use that stricter definition of what a polariton is.
 
For my purposes, I need a word for a quasiparticle that represents a photon in an optical medium of refractive index n. That is, a particle that travels at the speed of c/n, carries energy E and momentum p/n, where E and p are energy and momentum of a photon with the same frequency propagating through vacuum. I am not particulary interested in the microscopic describtion of a medium or the strength of the coupling. All that matters it that light couples to matter and the information about the coupling is contained in one number: n. Would a "polariton" be a suitable word?
 
Heirot said:
For my purposes, I need a word for a quasiparticle that represents a photon in an optical medium of refractive index n. That is, a particle that travels at the speed of c/n, carries energy E and momentum p/n, where E and p are energy and momentum of a photon with the same frequency propagating through vacuum. I am not particulary interested in the microscopic describtion of a medium or the strength of the coupling. All that matters it that light couples to matter and the information about the coupling is contained in one number: n. Would a "polariton" be a suitable word?
I assume that you are thinking about the polaritons created by the coupling of the optical phonon field to the electromagnetic wave field. Then, I would use the word "photon-like polariton" to describe the excitation corresponding to a mass less particle. There are "phonon-like" polaritons that correspond more closely to the optical phonons. The optical phonon has a "non-zero rest mass."

"Polaritons" have a dispersion curve consisting of two branches that are split by the coupling interactions. There is a forbidden gap in wavevector between the two branches. The boundaries of the gap are the frequencies of the transverse optical and longitudinal optical phonons.

The dispersion curves of the polariton are very important in understanding the jargon. I am currently looking at Figure 11 on page 287 of the following reference:

"Introduction to Solid State Physics" 7th edition by Charles Kittel (Wiley, 1996).

A "photon-like polariton" is not really the same as a photon. Strictly speaking, a true photon can exist only in a vacuum. However, the word "photon" is often applied to those excitations in a solid that travel at a phase velocity of "c/n", where "c" is the speed of light in a vacuum and "n" is the index of refraction.

The velocity of light in a solid is really the speed of the photon-like polariton in a vacuum. Similarly, the "optical phonons" in a solid are really "phonon-like" polaritons. The dispersion curves of the uncoupled phonon and the uncoupled photon cross. The branches are split at the point of crossing. Near the forbidden gap, polaritons have a mixed phonon-photon nature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K