Are the chances of getting a PhD generally the same at every school? (U.S.)

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FizzKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chances Phd School
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the likelihood of completing a PhD in Physics across different graduate schools in the U.S. Participants explore the factors influencing success rates, the implications of failing to complete a PhD, and alternative paths for those who do not finish their programs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention a statistic suggesting a 60% chance of obtaining a PhD, questioning its applicability across different institutions.
  • Others propose that the success rate may vary significantly from school to school and year to year, indicating the need for deeper analysis beyond a single statistic.
  • It is suggested that many students who do not complete their PhDs may choose to pursue other interests or job opportunities rather than failing outright.
  • Some argue that the failure rate is low for those who attempt comprehensive exams or defenses, but may increase when considering thesis completion.
  • Participants note that issues with advisors often contribute to dropout rates, rather than the students' capabilities.
  • Alternative career paths for those who do not finish their PhDs include obtaining a master's degree or pursuing jobs in fields like programming.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the statistics regarding PhD completion rates and the reasons behind students not finishing their programs. There is no consensus on whether the 60% completion rate is universally applicable or what factors most significantly influence success.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the variability of success rates based on individual circumstances, institutional differences, and the impact of advisor relationships on student retention.

FizzKid
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm told that as a PhD candidate, you have about a 60% chance of getting your PhD, which would almost seem like close to half the candidates don't get their PhDs at all and go home with nothing. Is this generally true at every graduate school in the U.S.? Strictly speaking of any given field in Physics, of course.

What do you do after a failed PhD attempt and you're left with a useless bachelor's? (I guess something not Engineering-related?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as pieces of paper go, if you've finished enough coursework, you can get a master's degree.

As far as what you can actually do, that depends on what skills you've developed during your stint as a graduate student. Computer-related work e.g. programming is a common "plan B."
 
Learning and studying is never useless. A PhD is a research degree, which has a focus in producing new information and advancing knowledge in the subject where it's done.

If you cannot get research funding and accepted to a PhD programme, then the likely reason is that your research topic is not interesting or relevant enough or your research plan is not well prepared to the one assessing it. In this case you can of course modify or change your research topic, enhance the plan and keep applying to elsewhere. You can and obviously should do research on your own as well, if you're really into researching the topic (which doing a PhD should be about). If you fail a PhD programme, then of course you've either not followed your plan and missed the deadlines or you haven't provided the research that you set to do or your dissertation wasn't accepted (i.e. it was likely flawed in some way).
 
Last edited:
FizzKid said:
I'm told that as a PhD candidate, you have about a 60% chance of getting your PhD, which would almost seem like close to half the candidates don't get their PhDs at all and go home with nothing. Is this generally true at every graduate school in the U.S.? Strictly speaking of any given field in Physics, of course.

What do you do after a failed PhD attempt and you're left with a useless bachelor's? (I guess something not Engineering-related?)

I'm sure there are considerable fluctuations on the success rate - from school to school and from year to year.

But this is one of those things where you have to look deeper than just a single statistic. Let's say for argument that your number is true (it seems a little low, but not completely unreasonable based on my non-US experience). How many of those actually FAIL, as in attempt the candidacy/comprehensive/defence and do not pass? And how many chose to pursue other interests?

It's not uncommon for a PhD candidate to receive a job offer over the 5 year period he or she is working. Some students actively seek these out and jump on them when they come. Others will discover they don't have a passion for research, or perhaps that their passions lie in other fields. Others will pursue professional degrees such as medicine or law. Some will realize that their project has a commercial application and head straight for the patent office. In none of these cases is the subject really considered a "failure."

In fact, even in the first scenario, often it's similar factors that lead to the result, it's just that unfortunately the system figures it out before the student does.

In physics, given the competative nature of graduate school placements, the GPAs needed to get in, the PGRE, the reference letters, etc. most students who do get in have a reasonable chance at success. Remember, if the admissions committee doesn't think you'll be successful, they're not going to invite you to the party. In my experience cases where the student has the right background, has earned acceptable marks, has the passion for the field and does the work, but still fails are extremely rare.
 
Choppy said:
How many of those actually FAIL, as in attempt the candidacy/comprehensive/defence and do not pass?

As phrased, very few. If you insert the word "thesis" in there, the numbers grow considerably.

As Choppy says, if the admission committee has any doubt about your ability to pass the comprehensive/qualifying exam, you won't be admitted. And I've *never* heard of anyone who wrote a thesis but failed the thesis defense. (Typically, if there is any chance of a failure there, your advisor will make you do more work on it... you won't be allowed to defend until success is guaranteed.)

The failure point typically comes after completing exams and coursework but before getting too far into a thesis. And while I hate to generalize too much, most of the dropouts that I've known can be attributed more to issues with advisors than to the students' ability. (I've known people who dropped out after their advisor left to go to another university, and others who worked on their advisor's project for years, only to be left without a thesis topic since all they did was implementation work.)
 
I know quite a few people who did not finish their PhDs. Only three of them were asked to leave. One of those three couldn't pass the screening exam after first year. The other two, quite frankly, didn't really do much work and the department lost patience.

Most people left for a job. It's hard to make Taco Bell wages for five years while your friends have 70k jobs. Simple as that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K