Are the p-norm and and the p'-norm equivalent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirk_mec1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equivalence of the p-norm and p'-norm in the context of vector spaces, specifically examining the conditions under which two norms can be considered equivalent. The original poster seeks to understand how to establish the constants required for this equivalence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of norm equivalence and attempt to derive inequalities relating the p-norm and p'-norm. Questions arise regarding the implications of specific values of p and q, and how to find appropriate constants for the inequalities.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with various participants providing insights and suggestions for approaching the problem. Some have proposed specific cases and bounds, while others have questioned the assumptions made and the steps taken. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the norms and their relationships without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of specifying the vector space and the conditions under which the norms are being compared. There is also mention of the need to clarify the assumptions regarding the values of p and q, as well as the implications of the norms being equal to 1.

dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Are the p-norm and and the p'-norm equivalent?

With
1 \leq p < \infty and 1 \leq p' < \infty


Homework Equations



Two norms p and q are equivalent if there is a M>0 and m>0 such that ||x||_p \leq M ||x||_q and

||x||_q \leq m ||x||_p

The Attempt at a Solution


I do not seem to get started. How can I find the constants?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Before expecting help you need to
1. Tell us what vector space ##x## is in.
2. Show us what you have tried.
 
x \in \mathbb{R} ^k

Suppose I take k = 2 and I presume p>q (I do not like the accent so I choose to use q) then I need to prove that:(|x_1|^p + |x_2|^p)^{1/p} \leq M (|x_1|^q + |x_2|^q)^{1/q}This is not correct but if I assume the vector elements to be larger than one then:

I know that |x_i|^p \geq |x_i|^q with i=1,2.

I also know that |x_i|^{1/p} \leq |x_i|^{1/q} with i=1,2.

Then I'm stuck.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ##1 \leq p < q < \infty##.

If ##\|x\|_p = 1##, can you find an upper bound for ##|x_i|^p##? What does this imply about ##\|x\|_q## in this case?
 
if ||x||_p =1 then |x_i|^p \leq 1 which implies then that |x_i|^q \leq |x_i|^p for i = 1,...,k but then:

|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q \leq |x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p

taking root at both sides

(|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/p} \leq (|x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p)^{1/p}

but the RHS is 1

(|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/p} \leq 1

taking root at both sides

||x||_q^{1/p} \leq 1

This has an lower bound

||x||_q \leq ||x||_q^{1/p}So the conclusion is that:

||x||_q \leq ||x||_p with ||x||_p=1Suppose the vector x has length A (in the p-norm) then we can adapt this to:

||x||_q \leq ||x||_p \cdot A^{1/q}Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
dirk_mec1 said:
if ||x||_p =1 then |x_i|^p \leq 1 which implies then that |x_i|^q \leq |x_i|^p for i = 1,...,k but then:

|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q \leq |x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p

taking root at both sides

(|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/p} \leq (|x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p)^{1/p}

but the RHS is 1

(|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/p} \leq 1

taking root at both sides

||x||_q^{1/p} \leq 1
OK so far.

This has an lower bound

||x||_q \leq ||x||_q^{1/p}
OK, here you're using the fact that if you take the right hand side to the ##p##'th power, then the result is smaller since ##\|x\|_q^{1/p} \leq 1##.

You can save a few steps if you avoid taking ##p##'th roots. If ##\|x\|_p = 1##, then ##|x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p = 1##, so
$$|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q \leq |x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p = 1$$
and therefore
$$\|x\|_q = (|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/q} \leq 1 = \|x\|_p$$

Suppose the vector x has length A (in the p-norm) then we can adapt this to:

||x||_q \leq ||x||_p \cdot A^{1/q}

Is this correct?
No. If ##\|x\|_p = A##, then we can write ##x = Au## where ##\|u\|_p = 1##. Then:
$$\|x\|_q = \|Au\|_q = A\|u\|_q \leq ?$$
Now apply the result obtained above.
For the other inequality ##||x||_p \leq M ||x||_q##, I recommend that you once again start with the case ##\|x\|_p = 1##. In that case, you need to prove that there is some ##M## for which
$$\|x\|_q \geq \frac{1}{M}$$
The key idea here is that if ##\|x\|_p = 1##, it's not possible for ALL of the elements of ##x## to be small. Can you find a lower bound for ##\max |x_i|##?
 
\|x\|_q = \|Au\|_q = A\|u\|_q \leq A\|u\|_p = \|Au\|_p= ||x||_p

So m=1 in this case?

I think that the lower bound for \mbox{max}|x_i| = (\frac{1}{k})^{1/p}

But I don't understand how to proceed.
 
Last edited:
dirk_mec1 said:
\|x\|_q = \|Au\|_q = A\|u\|_q \leq A\|u\|_p = \|Au\|_p= ||x||_p

So m=1 in this case?
Yes.

I think that the lower bound for \mbox{max}|x_i| = (\frac{1}{k})^{1/p}
Yes, this is correct. Sketch of proof: if ##|x_i| < (1/k)^{1/p}## for all ##i##, then ##|x_i|^p < 1/k## for all ##i##, so ##|x_1|^p + \cdots + |x_k|^p < 1##, contradicting the fact that ##\|x\|_p = 1##. So for at least one ##i## we must have ##|x_i| > (1/k)^{1/p}##.

For the next step, note that the above implies (for the same ##i##) that ##|x_i|^q > (1/k)^{q/p}##. What does this imply about ##\|x\|_q##?
 
I think it implies that ||x||_q \geq \left(\frac{1}{k} \right)^{q/p}Now suppose ||x||_p=A We can write x=Au with ||u||_p= 1 then we get||x||_q =||Au||_q =A ||u||_q \geq A \left(\frac{1}{k} \right)^{q/p} = M\cdot A||u||_p = M\cdot ||Au||_p = M ||x||_p with M= \left(\frac{1}{k} \right)^{q/p}

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
dirk_mec1 said:
I think it implies that ||x||_q \geq \left(\frac{1}{k} \right)^{q/p}
Close but not quite right:
$$\|x\|_q^q = |x_1|^q + \cdots + |x_k|^q \geq |x_i|^q > (1/k)^{q/p}$$
where ##i## is as in my previous post. Taking ##q##'th roots of both sides, we get
$$\|x\|_q > (1/k)^{1/p}$$
The rest of your post is fine if you make the corresponding adjustment.
 
  • #11
Ok got it thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K