Are the p-norm and and the p'-norm equivalent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirk_mec1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent
dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Are the p-norm and and the p'-norm equivalent?

With
[tex]1 \leq p < \infty[/tex] and [tex]1 \leq p' < \infty[/tex]


Homework Equations



Two norms p and q are equivalent if there is a M>0 and m>0 such that [tex]||x||_p \leq M ||x||_q[/tex] and

[tex]||x||_q \leq m ||x||_p[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I do not seem to get started. How can I find the constants?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Before expecting help you need to
1. Tell us what vector space ##x## is in.
2. Show us what you have tried.
 
[tex]x \in \mathbb{R} ^k[/tex]

Suppose I take k = 2 and I presume p>q (I do not like the accent so I choose to use q) then I need to prove that:[tex](|x_1|^p + |x_2|^p)^{1/p} \leq M (|x_1|^q + |x_2|^q)^{1/q}[/tex]This is not correct but if I assume the vector elements to be larger than one then:

I know that [itex]|x_i|^p \geq |x_i|^q[/itex] with i=1,2.

I also know that [itex]|x_i|^{1/p} \leq |x_i|^{1/q}[/itex] with i=1,2.

Then I'm stuck.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ##1 \leq p < q < \infty##.

If ##\|x\|_p = 1##, can you find an upper bound for ##|x_i|^p##? What does this imply about ##\|x\|_q## in this case?
 
if [itex]||x||_p =1[/itex] then [itex]|x_i|^p \leq 1[/itex] which implies then that [itex]|x_i|^q \leq |x_i|^p[/itex] for i = 1,...,k but then:

[tex]|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q \leq |x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p[/tex]

taking root at both sides

[tex](|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/p} \leq (|x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p)^{1/p}[/tex]

but the RHS is 1

[tex](|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/p} \leq 1[/tex]

taking root at both sides

[tex]||x||_q^{1/p} \leq 1[/tex]

This has an lower bound

[tex]||x||_q \leq ||x||_q^{1/p}[/tex]So the conclusion is that:

[itex]||x||_q \leq ||x||_p[/itex] with [itex]||x||_p=1[/itex]Suppose the vector x has length A (in the p-norm) then we can adapt this to:

[itex]||x||_q \leq ||x||_p \cdot A^{1/q}[/itex]Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
dirk_mec1 said:
if [itex]||x||_p =1[/itex] then [itex]|x_i|^p \leq 1[/itex] which implies then that [itex]|x_i|^q \leq |x_i|^p[/itex] for i = 1,...,k but then:

[tex]|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q \leq |x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p[/tex]

taking root at both sides

[tex](|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/p} \leq (|x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p)^{1/p}[/tex]

but the RHS is 1

[tex](|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/p} \leq 1[/tex]

taking root at both sides

[tex]||x||_q^{1/p} \leq 1[/tex]
OK so far.

This has an lower bound

[tex]||x||_q \leq ||x||_q^{1/p}[/tex]
OK, here you're using the fact that if you take the right hand side to the ##p##'th power, then the result is smaller since ##\|x\|_q^{1/p} \leq 1##.

You can save a few steps if you avoid taking ##p##'th roots. If ##\|x\|_p = 1##, then ##|x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p = 1##, so
$$|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q \leq |x_1|^p +... + |x_k|^p = 1$$
and therefore
$$\|x\|_q = (|x_1|^q +... + |x_k|^q)^{1/q} \leq 1 = \|x\|_p$$

Suppose the vector x has length A (in the p-norm) then we can adapt this to:

[itex]||x||_q \leq ||x||_p \cdot A^{1/q}[/itex]

Is this correct?
No. If ##\|x\|_p = A##, then we can write ##x = Au## where ##\|u\|_p = 1##. Then:
$$\|x\|_q = \|Au\|_q = A\|u\|_q \leq ?$$
Now apply the result obtained above.
For the other inequality ##||x||_p \leq M ||x||_q##, I recommend that you once again start with the case ##\|x\|_p = 1##. In that case, you need to prove that there is some ##M## for which
$$\|x\|_q \geq \frac{1}{M}$$
The key idea here is that if ##\|x\|_p = 1##, it's not possible for ALL of the elements of ##x## to be small. Can you find a lower bound for ##\max |x_i|##?
 
[tex]\|x\|_q = \|Au\|_q = A\|u\|_q \leq A\|u\|_p = \|Au\|_p= ||x||_p[/tex]

So m=1 in this case?

I think that the lower bound for [itex]\mbox{max}|x_i| = (\frac{1}{k})^{1/p}[/itex]

But I don't understand how to proceed.
 
Last edited:
dirk_mec1 said:
[tex]\|x\|_q = \|Au\|_q = A\|u\|_q \leq A\|u\|_p = \|Au\|_p= ||x||_p[/tex]

So m=1 in this case?
Yes.

I think that the lower bound for [itex]\mbox{max}|x_i| = (\frac{1}{k})^{1/p}[/itex]
Yes, this is correct. Sketch of proof: if ##|x_i| < (1/k)^{1/p}## for all ##i##, then ##|x_i|^p < 1/k## for all ##i##, so ##|x_1|^p + \cdots + |x_k|^p < 1##, contradicting the fact that ##\|x\|_p = 1##. So for at least one ##i## we must have ##|x_i| > (1/k)^{1/p}##.

For the next step, note that the above implies (for the same ##i##) that ##|x_i|^q > (1/k)^{q/p}##. What does this imply about ##\|x\|_q##?
 
I think it implies that [itex]||x||_q \geq \left(\frac{1}{k} \right)^{q/p}[/itex]Now suppose [itex]||x||_p=A[/itex] We can write [itex]x=Au[/itex] with [itex]||u||_p= 1[/itex] then we get[itex]||x||_q =||Au||_q =A ||u||_q \geq A \left(\frac{1}{k} \right)^{q/p} = M\cdot A||u||_p = M\cdot ||Au||_p = M ||x||_p[/itex] with [itex]M= \left(\frac{1}{k} \right)^{q/p}[/itex]

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
dirk_mec1 said:
I think it implies that [itex]||x||_q \geq \left(\frac{1}{k} \right)^{q/p}[/itex]
Close but not quite right:
$$\|x\|_q^q = |x_1|^q + \cdots + |x_k|^q \geq |x_i|^q > (1/k)^{q/p}$$
where ##i## is as in my previous post. Taking ##q##'th roots of both sides, we get
$$\|x\|_q > (1/k)^{1/p}$$
The rest of your post is fine if you make the corresponding adjustment.
 
  • #11
Ok got it thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K