Are there advantages to wood pellets over wood chips?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stormer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wood
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the advantages and disadvantages of using wood pellets compared to wood chips for burning. Participants explore various aspects including efficiency, moisture content, and production processes, with a focus on theoretical and practical implications in energy generation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that both wood chips and wood pellets can be fed into burn chambers using similar mechanisms, and both produce char that can be removed automatically.
  • There is a discussion about the additional steps required to produce wood pellets from whole wood, including converting chips to sawdust and then pelletizing, which some argue may be energy-intensive and time-consuming.
  • One participant mentions that wood pellets are dried to a low moisture content, which is suggested to improve combustion efficiency compared to burning green wood, which can contain up to 50% water.
  • Another participant estimates that a significant portion of wood needs to be burned to dry the remaining wood, implying that dry pellets may lead to better energy output.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential inefficiency of burning wet wood, as it may reduce boiler efficiency and energy output.
  • There is a suggestion that drying pellets en-masse may be more efficient than allowing wood to self-dry during combustion or drying wood chips en-masse.
  • One participant references personal experience with sawdust piles, noting that rotten wood may produce less energy when burned.
  • A later reply provides a link to a search engine, implying that further information can be found online.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the efficiency and practicality of wood pellets versus wood chips, with no consensus reached on whether one is definitively better than the other.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding moisture content and energy efficiency remain unresolved, and the discussion does not clarify the specific conditions under which each fuel type may perform better.

Stormer
Messages
121
Reaction score
23
Both wood chips and wood pellets can be automatically feed into the burn chamber by Screw Conveyors, transport belts, and vibratory feeders. And both make char that is small enough to be automatically removed from the burn chamber. And both also has a shape and size that allows enough air to move trug the burn pile to feed the fire (unlike sawdust that will compact and stop to much air for it to burn).

But to make pellets you have to go trough two more steps (making chips into sawdust, and then pelletize it) to make them from whole wood compared to wood chips. And it takes more energy, and more machinery and time. So why are pellets used and not just wood chips? Is there any advantage i have missed? Or is it just to have a way to use sawdust waste from production of wood products for something useful? And in that case wasteful if whole wood pieces is used to make it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Wood pellets are also dried to a specified, low, moisture content. Green wood can be as much as 50% water by weight. Much of the energy from burning green wood goes to evaporating that water. It also reduces the boiler efficiency.

I saw one estimate that about 20% of the wood needs to be burned to dry the remaining wood. I saw another plot of boiler efficiency vs wood moisture. The increase in combustion efficiency was much more than the loss of wood burned to dry the wood.

Dry pellets do not rot. I don't know how fast green wood chips rot, but I remember sticking my hand into a sawmill sawdust pile. It was hot only a few inches in. Rotten wood gives off less energy when burned.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara, anorlunda and 256bits
jrmichler said:
Wood pellets are also dried to a specified, low, moisture content.

I guess its more efficient to dry the pellets en-masse than to let the wood self-dry as it burns, or to dry wood chips en-masse?
 
Grinkle said:
I guess its more efficient to dry the pellets en-masse than to let the wood self-dry as it burns, or to dry wood chips en-masse?
If you dry it in the fire, the energy needed to convert water to steam and to send the steam up the chimney is subtracted from the heat you put into your room. So yes, it is better to get dried wood from your supplier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
23K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K