Are Unitary Transformations Always Linear?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Unitary transformations between Hilbert spaces are defined as transformations that preserve inner products and are necessarily bounded linear transformations. This conclusion is established by demonstrating that the expression |U(x + y) - U(x) - U(y)|^2 equals zero, utilizing the properties of inner products. Furthermore, it is confirmed that all surjective isometries between Hilbert spaces are linear, reinforcing the linearity of unitary transformations. The discussion emphasizes the equivalence of preserving inner products with being an isometry, which inherently implies boundedness and linearity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hilbert spaces
  • Knowledge of inner product spaces
  • Familiarity with the concept of isometries
  • Basic principles of linear transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hilbert spaces in depth
  • Learn about the implications of isometries in functional analysis
  • Explore the proof of linearity for isometries in inner product spaces
  • Investigate the role of bounded operators in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying functional analysis or quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in the properties of unitary transformations and their applications in Hilbert spaces.

lunde
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hello, I had a question regarding unitary transformations. The most common definition I see for unitary transformations is defined as a transformation between Hilbert spaces that preserves inner products. I was wondering if all unitary transformations between Hilbert spaces (according to this definition) are necessarily bounded linear transformations. (i.e. U( \alpha x + \beta y ) = \alpha U x + \beta U y and U \in \mathcal{L} (H_1 , H_2).) I have been trying to prove this to myself for the last hour but can't seem to show this for some reason.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try showing that the quantity |U(x + y) - U(x) - U(y)|^2 is zero by writing it as an inner product, expanding, and finally using the preservation of the inner product by U.
 
lunde said:
Hello, I had a question regarding unitary transformations. The most common definition I see for unitary transformations is defined as a transformation between Hilbert spaces that preserves inner products. I was wondering if all unitary transformations between Hilbert spaces (according to this definition) are necessarily bounded linear transformations. (i.e. U( \alpha x + \beta y ) = \alpha U x + \beta U y and U \in \mathcal{L} (H_1 , H_2).) I have been trying to prove this to myself for the last hour but can't seem to show this for some reason.

I think it follows from the linearity of the inner product. One might try to calculate <U( \alpha x + \beta y ) - \alpha U x + \beta U y,U( \alpha x + \beta y ) - \alpha U x + \beta U y>, using the axioms of the inner product. If it gives zero, you are home.
 
Thanks. That's a cool way to show this, and then since it's an isometry it's bounded, great.
 
Preserving inner product is equivalent to being an isometry, and this implies boundedness and linearity. However, unitary transformations are also (by definition) required to be surjective, or at least have dense range.
 
How can you show that all surjective isometries between Hilbert spaces are linear?
 
Surjectivity is not needed for linearity. Every isometry between inner product spaces is linear, as follows from showing that the quantity which element4 wrote equals zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K