chaoseverlasting
- 1,051
- 3
Ive recently started playing poker on facebook and its a really addictive game. Are any of you into poker?
The discussion revolves around participants' experiences and perspectives on playing poker, particularly in online and home settings. It touches on themes of addiction, strategies, emotional control, and the social aspects of poker games, including both casual play and more serious gambling contexts.
Participants generally share a variety of experiences and opinions regarding poker, with some expressing enjoyment and others skepticism about gambling. There is no clear consensus on the nature of poker as a game or its addictive qualities, as perspectives vary widely.
Some discussions include personal strategies and experiences that may not apply universally. Participants mention varying levels of emotional control and the impact of social dynamics on gameplay, indicating that individual experiences can differ significantly.
Individuals interested in poker, whether for social play or competitive gaming, may find insights into strategies, emotional management, and the social aspects of poker games valuable.
turbo-1 said:Yes, but only with real cards and real money. I used to be able to pick up a pretty reliable $40-50 a week playing poker with the paper machine crew after our last night-shift. Some of those guys were reckless and easy to read.
turbo-1 said:He taught me to play poker when I was a kid (using my head, not my emotions) and he never cut me a bit of slack.
When you are playing at a full table in games where cards are displayed progressively, try to keep track of some critical cards that have been played - both suits and values. When you have a pretty good hand, its tempting to chase it even in the face of the possibility that others might be holding much better hands. You can't do this playing stud - you can only watch the betting patterns, the draw (and reactions of the players), but it is a real handy skill when playing games in with there are shared common cards, or in which player are required to reveal cards from their hands in stages. When you have 7 or more players at the table, you'll need to resort to games that feature shared common cards if you want to play 7-card games. If you're playing "dealer's choice" this is a good opportunity to call such a game. Many novice players cannot easily shift gears between stud, draw, and more complex 7-card games, and that's where they make $$$ mistakes.TheStatutoryApe said:I still have trouble even though I have tried training myself not to play emotionally. I've gotten pretty good at not trying to guess if someone is bluffing and just playing on the strength of my hand though.
I know that good poker playing comes from experience rather than books but are there any that you or your dad ever read that were good? Doyle Brunson seems like a good source or maybe I'm just stereotyping. I also have a lot of respect for Phil Ivey and Daniel Negreanu though I have no idea if Ivey has written a book.
turbo-1 said:When you are playing at a full table in games where cards are displayed progressively, try to keep track of some critical cards that have been played - both suits and values. When you have a pretty good hand, its tempting to chase it even in the face of the possibility that others might be holding much better hands. You can't do this playing stud - you can only watch the betting patterns, the draw (and reactions of the players), but it is a real handy skill when playing games in with there are shared common cards, or in which player are required to reveal cards from their hands in stages. When you have 7 or more players at the table, you'll need to resort to games that feature shared common cards if you want to play 7-card games. If you're playing "dealer's choice" this is a good opportunity to call such a game. Many novice players cannot easily shift gears between stud, draw, and more complex 7-card games, and that's where they make $$$ mistakes.
Proton Soup said:i can't get excited about gambling. never have. fresh out of high school, some friends and i pooled our bets at the dog track and doubled our money. it made for free food and entertainment, with a bit left over. and i didn't get the bug. i don't think i could ever get into it unless i knew how to say count cards and could reliably bring in income. then it'd be like a job.
That's pretty impressive. Have any tips?Jack21222 said:I've been into poker for a long time. I keep track of my winnings, and I am profitable at $25 online no limit at pokerstars, which have blinds of 0.10/0.25. After this graph, I moved up to $50 no limit, and went on a bit of a downswing. After that downswing, I withdrew my bankroll to pay for a semester of college.
Here's my graph up until I switched to $50NL
[image]
Note: This graph does not take into account money from bonuses from the site, which amounted to about 300 dollars.
I recently deposited another 50 bucks, and have been playing penny stakes to build my bankroll. I've got it up to about 120 right now. I can't wait until I build it up enough to move back into the stakes where real money can be made.
Proton Soup said:i can't get excited about gambling. never have. fresh out of high school, some friends and i pooled our bets at the dog track and doubled our money. it made for free food and entertainment, with a bit left over. and i didn't get the bug. i don't think i could ever get into it unless i knew how to say count cards and could reliably bring in income. then it'd be like a job.
TheStatutoryApe said:That's pretty impressive. Have any tips?
I have a bit of a competitive streak. Playing for something other than money people tend to do silly things and go all for broke since its just "pretzels" or what have you. It cuts out a lot of the strategy involved.Moonbear said:I'm just as happy to play for pretzels as cash.
TheStatutoryApe said:I have a bit of a competitive streak. Playing for something other than money people tend to do silly things and go all for broke since its just "pretzels" or what have you. It cuts out a lot of the strategy involved.
TheStatutoryApe said:Counting cards can apparently be dangerous. Have you seen the movie 21? Its pretty good.
Proton Soup said:i'm familiar with some of the background story. if it's really that dangerous, then to me it's just another good reason to ban gambling. nothing but a bunch of thugs if you ask me. they have the odds in their favor for all the games, which is just another name for "rigged". anybody that can beat them at their own game is a hero in my book.
Nobody beats the house. That's no reason to ban gambling. The suckers know the house has the odds stacked against them. Really! The house has TWO total rake-in buckets on every roulette wheel in the US.Proton Soup said:i'm familiar with some of the background story. if it's really that dangerous, then to me it's just another good reason to ban gambling. nothing but a bunch of thugs if you ask me. they have the odds in their favor for all the games, which is just another name for "rigged". anybody that can beat them at their own game is a hero in my book.
TheStatutoryApe said:I think that the movie makes it a bit more extreme than real life but I have heard of card counters that were threatened at the very least.
As far as banning gambling I don't see why anyone should get in the way of a transaction (or game) between two persons unless one is obviously being defrauded. The fact that games like black jack favour the house does not seem fraudulent to me.
Proton Soup said:one of the few useful things i learned from psychology class many years ago is how important it is to the business of gambling. i can't do anything but laugh when i see the industry running some gamblers anonymous type PSA, because their games, beginning with the good-ole one-armed bandit, are purposefully designed to maximize gambling behaviour. how can we get the rat to press the lever the most times for the least amount of food pellets?
it is not an honest transaction in my mind. they are actively promoting addiction and just as bad, if not worse, than drug dealers.
I started at pokerstars yesterday. I've just been playing the play money games to get a hang of the software and the general feel of playing online as well as being able to calculate the odds quicker than I'm used to. I'm going to put 50 dollars in and see where that takes me.Jack21222 said:I've been into poker for a long time. I keep track of my winnings, and I am profitable at $25 online no limit at pokerstars, which have blinds of 0.10/0.25. After this graph, I moved up to $50 no limit, and went on a bit of a downswing. After that downswing, I withdrew my bankroll to pay for a semester of college.
moose said:I started at pokerstars yesterday. I've just been playing the play money games to get a hang of the software and the general feel of playing online as well as being able to calculate the odds quicker than I'm used to. I'm going to put 50 dollars in and see where that takes me.
I'm going to have to get used to solely betting tells and other such things. I'm excited to see what happens, but I'm not expecting anything.
Cyrus said:I LOOOOVEEEE to play poker. They used to have free nightly toruneys at this bar near my house. I would go there almost 7 days a week. It had enough regulars to fill up 7 or 8 full tables. It was a ton of fun. First prize was a 25 gift certificate at the bar so you could buy food and drinks and a $25 american express prepaid card.
I tried online but lost $100 very quickly because I was too impatient playing online.
Jack21222 said:With a 50 dollar bankroll, stick to the penny stakes. 0.01/0.02 No Limit, if you prefer tournaments, they have some 1 dollar buy-in tournaments which are pretty soft. Lack of bankroll management has caused many players, even otherwise good ones, to go broke due to variance.
Jack21222 said:With a 50 dollar bankroll, stick to the penny stakes. 0.01/0.02 No Limit, if you prefer tournaments, they have some 1 dollar buy-in tournaments which are pretty soft. Lack of bankroll management has caused many players, even otherwise good ones, to go broke due to variance.