Are you sure that objects which moves enought fast are not black holes?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Born2Perform
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the relationship between the speed of an object and its potential to become a black hole, focusing on concepts of relativistic mass, gravitational fields, and the escape of light from massive objects. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications regarding black holes and relativistic effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if relativistic mass does not create a gravitational field, then objects moving at high speeds cannot become black holes.
  • Others argue that whether an object is a black hole is a global property and does not change based on the object's velocity, as long as it is not a black hole in its rest frame.
  • A participant questions the assertion that light escaping from an object is unaffected by its velocity, suggesting that visibility of particles may change with velocity.
  • Another participant clarifies that for an object to be classified as a black hole, light must be trapped by it, regardless of the object's motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of velocity on gravitational fields and the conditions for an object to be considered a black hole. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of relativistic mass and gravitational fields, as well as the assumptions regarding the behavior of light in different frames of reference.

Born2Perform
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
In order that any mass creates a gravitational field, if those objects do not become black holes, this means that relativistic mass does not create a grav field.

How can a mass increasing not produce a deeper space warp? That is the mass does not increase with speed?
Apologies my english.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Born2Perform said:
In order that any mass creates a gravitational field, if those objects do not become black holes, this means that relativistic mass does not create a grav field.

How can a mass increasing not produce a deeper space warp? That is the mass does not increase with speed?
Apologies my english.

Yes.

See the sci.physics.faq http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/black_fast.html"

Whether an object is a black hole or not is a global property of the object. Therfore if an object is not a black hole in it's rest frame, it is not not a black hole if you whiz by it at a high velocity.

The gravitational field of an object can change when its velocity changes. This can most easily be seen by means of the tidal force.

If you move at "right angles" to an object, the tidal force you experience will be greater than if you were standing still.

Interestingly enough, however, if you move directly towards or away from a massive object, the tidal force you experience will not change (it will be the same as if you were not moving).

You can find the later fact in MTW's "Gravitation" (page numbers on request).

This demonstrates that velocity can change "gravity". It also helps illustrate how the gravity from a moving object is not symmetrical. It is stronger "to the sides" than it is in front or in back. This is similar in general behavior (though not in exact detail) to how the electric field from an electric charge acts.

What's important as far as an object being a black hole or not is whether or not light can escape from it. That does not change when the velocities object changes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pervect said:
What's important as far as an object being a black hole or not is whether or not light can escape from it. That does not change when the velocities object changes.
Hmmmm, is that correct?
Does not something happen to the visibility of particles leaving or entering an object during a change in velocity?
 
Consider the rest frame of the object. Light leaves it and escapes to infinty.

Now consider the object in a moving frame. Light abberrates, but it still escapes to infinity.

For an object to be a black hole, light must be trapped by the object.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K