Are Your Calculations for Energy and Friction Correct?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculations of energy and friction in a physics problem involving a block on a ramp. The potential energy (U) at the top, calculated as U = mgh, equals 1350 J for a mass of 3 kg and a height of 45 m. The work done by friction (Wfr) is derived from the equation Wfr = Ffr * d, leading to a distance (d) of 45 m. Participants confirm the calculations are correct, suggesting a likely error in the problem statement regarding the coefficient of kinetic friction, which should be 0.1 instead of 1.0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy and kinetic energy concepts
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle
  • Knowledge of friction coefficients in physics
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the work-energy theorem in classical mechanics
  • Study the implications of different coefficients of friction on energy calculations
  • Explore potential energy and kinetic energy transformations in various systems
  • Learn about common errors in physics problem statements and how to identify them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching energy concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the work-energy relationship and friction in mechanical systems.

HaoPhysics
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2017-5-5_18-2-1.png


Homework Equations


The block has potential energy U at the top of the ramp, and this is transferred to kinetic energy K at the bottom, which is then trasnfered to work done by friction, Wfr.
U = K Conservation of energy
K = Wfr Conservation of energy
g = 10 m/s2

The Attempt at a Solution


U = mgh = 3*45*10 = 1350 J
1350 J = Wfr = Ffr * d = m*g*u*d = 3*10*1*d
1350 = 30*d
d = 45 m

This does not match the answers. Am I doing anything wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculations are correct. There is likely an error in the problem statement. I suspect that they intended the coefficient of kinetic friction to be 0.1. Your answer of 45 m is correct for the given information.
 
gneill said:
Your calculations are correct. There is likely an error in the problem statement. I suspect that they intended the coefficient of kinetic friction to be 0.1. Your answer of 45 m is correct for the given information.

That is a very good point. We usually don't see coefficients of friction to be 1.0, so it probably was 0.1. I just wanted to make sure my understanding of work-energy relationship was correct. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K