Are Your Moment Calculations for Bent Bar Reactions Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter whereitsbeen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Internal Reactions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of internal reactions for a structural member, specifically addressing the moments at sections MM and NN. The user, Mike, initially calculated moments incorrectly, leading to discrepancies with the expected values of 21 k/ft and +6 k/ft. Key errors identified include mislabeling sections and misunderstanding the calculation of moments, which should consider the perpendicular distance from the force's line of action. The correct approach emphasizes the importance of equilibrium in structural analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Free Body Diagrams (FBDs)
  • Knowledge of equilibrium conditions in structural analysis
  • Familiarity with moment calculations in mechanics
  • Basic principles of fixed connections in structural systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of calculating moments in structural mechanics
  • Study the concept of Free Body Diagrams and their application in equilibrium analysis
  • Learn about fixed connections and their impact on internal reactions
  • Explore examples of moment calculations for various loading conditions
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in analyzing and designing structural systems will benefit from this discussion.

whereitsbeen
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Calculate the internal reactions for the member shown at the sections indicated;
picture attached with FBD's

I have the V & F forces correct but my moments are off. Can you point me in the right direction here?

V M-M = 2k
F M-M =-0.5k

V N-N = -2k
F N-N = 0.5k

M M-M = -10k (2) + 0.5k (2) + 2k -0.5k + M=0
M= -18.5 k/ft

answer claims to be 21k/ft

M N-N = -2k (3) + 0.5k (3) - 2k +0.5k +M=0
M= - 6 k/ft

answer claims to be + 6k/ft

Thank You
-Mike
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.jpg
    Untitled-1.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 537
Physics news on Phys.org
Your FBD's need some work in identifying force directions.
You have labeled the sections MM and NN , but then reverse them in your calcs.
I don't know what you mean about Ay = 10 K by inspection.
You should indicate that the base at A is a fixed connection.
The unit of moments or torques is ft*kips, not kips/ft.
For equilibrium, the sum of forces in the x direction, and the sum of forces in the y direction, and the sum of moments about any point, inetrnally or externally, are each equal to zero.

You are not calculating moments correctly. The moment of a force is the magnitude of the force times the perpendicular distance from its line of action to the point about which you are taking moments. If clockwise moments are considered plus, then counterclockwise moments are negative.
If you look at section MM (which you call NN in error), the 2 k force produces a cw moment about MM of (2)(3) = 6 ft-k. That means that the momnet at MM must be - 6 ft-k (CCW) in order for the moments to sum to 0 for equilibrium. The 0.5 K force produces no moment about MM, because there is no 'perpendicular distance' moment arm. And don't add up forces in ths equation...which you did...when you are summing moments. Move on to the next section 'NN'...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K