Area moment of inertia-circular cross section

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The area moment of inertia for a circular cross-section is defined as I_d = \frac{\pi a^4}{4}, where 'a' is the radius of the circular disk. This value is derived using the integral I = \int_{A} y^{2} dA, with y defined as r\sin\theta in polar coordinates. The Euler-Bernoulli Beam Equation, which incorporates the area moment of inertia, is expressed as \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\left[E I \frac{d^2w}{dx^2}\right]=\rho, linking material properties and beam deflection. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving bending problems in structural engineering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of area moment of inertia calculations
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and double integrals
  • Knowledge of the Euler-Bernoulli Beam Equation
  • Basic principles of mechanics of materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of area moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about the applications of the Euler-Bernoulli Beam Equation in structural analysis
  • Explore advanced topics in mechanics of materials, including higher-order differential equations
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving bending problems in beams
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, mechanical engineers, and students studying mechanics of materials will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on beam analysis and design.

ichiro_w
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Area moment of inertia--circular cross section

From the bending beam calculation, the moment of inertia of the cross section with regard to a coplanor axis of rotation is used. If we have a circular "beam", the area moment of inertia of a circular disk of radius a about a diameter is I_d = \frac{\pi a^4}{4} according to two separate references. I believe the integral involved can be generally stated as I_d = \int y^2 dA if y is the distance to the diameter d perpendicular to y which diameter (as all diameters of a uniformly mass distributed disk) passes through the centroid of the disk.

Now my stab at actually evaluating this is to do a double integral in polar coordinates and long story short the only way I can come up with the agreed upon answer is \int_0^\pi\int_0^a r^2\; r\; \mathrm{dr}\;\mathrm{d\theta} where r\;\mathrm{dr}\;\mathrm{d\theta}=dA and r^2 is the distance to the origin (centroid)

If I were in a creative writing glass I might get a passing grade for this fudge but I really would like to understand what I am doing better than backing into an answer like this. Any help would truly be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your formula is non-sense, and seems to have been contrived in order to get the agreed upon answer.

Here's a correct derivation:
We have:
y=r\sin\theta
Hence, you have:
I=\int_{A}y^{2}dA=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{a}r^{3}\sin^{2}\theta{drd\theta}=
\frac{\pi{a}^4}{4}
as required.
 
Last edited:
Thank you arildno,
I did that integral sometime in the past 3 years and was racking my memory to come up with it; I found another nonsense solution that agreed with the known answer but as in the one I posted (after 2 days and maybe 6 hours surfing the web searching for answers), the limits of integration didn't make sense.
Even so , the polar coordinate translations are basic and I am chagrined. It was not a waste however as this is the first time I have heard the term area moment of inertia even though I have done a lot of mass moments and radii of gyration calculations. The Euler-Bernoulli Beam Equation was under review here and it is fascinating:

\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\left[E I \frac{d^2w}{dx^2}\right]=\rho where E is Young's Modulus, I is the area moment of inertia, w is the out of plane displacement and \rho is force acting downward on a very short segment and has units of Force per unit length (distributed loading). The x-axis is the lengthwise polar axis passing through the center of the beam. If E and I do not vary with x, then E I \frac{d^4w}{dx^4} = \rho This is the first ODE I have come across that utilizes the fourth derivative and since the boundary conditions, depending on how the beam is supported include up to the third derivative, I wanted to make sure that I understood what the equation was saying and be able to relate to the area moment integral was critical. Thank you again.
 
It's been quite a while since I did bending problems; however, if I remember correctly, 4th derivatives are rather common there.
I think, for example, that the fourth order biharmonic equation occurs naturally (that is "the Laplacian of the Laplacian")
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
821
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K