Area of A Segmented Circle Cut By A Chord

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the area of a segment of a circle defined by a chord, given only the diameter and the chord length, without using angles or trigonometric functions.

Discussion Character

  • Assumption checking, Problem interpretation, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the chord length and the area of the segment, questioning the feasibility of calculating the area without using angles. Some suggest that the area of the triangle formed by the chord and the circle's center can be expressed without angles, while others note that the area of the sector requires angle information.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants express skepticism about the possibility of solving the problem under the given constraints, while others suggest potential methods that may not align with the restrictions. There is a recognition of differing opinions regarding the appropriateness of the problem's formulation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem's constraints, specifically the prohibition on using angles, complicate the calculation significantly. There is also mention of a related thread that discusses similar issues, indicating a broader context of inquiry around this topic.

TAMUwbEE
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Member warned about posting with no effort shown

Homework Statement


Given a circle with a set diameter, how does one calculate the area of the segment below?

upload_2015-9-9_20-6-37.png

Homework Equations


The only information available is the diameter (in this particular example it is 14"), You may not use angles. Only the chord length.

Thank you for your reply.
Miguel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The area T of the triangle made by the circle centre and the chord can be expressed in terms of L (chord length) and R without using any angles.

But the area of the sector comprising that triangle and the segment is proportional to the angle subtended at the centre by the chord. So it seems to me we cannot calculate the area of that sector without using either that angle or something equivalent to an angle (eg an inverse trig function of a ratio of R- and L-related items).

If we can't calculate the sector area with those restrictions then we can't calculate the segment area either, since the difference between the two is just T.
 
andrewkirk said:
The area T of the triangle made by the circle centre and the chord can be expressed in terms of L (chord length) and R without using any angles.

But the area of the sector comprising that triangle and the segment is proportional to the angle subtended at the centre by the chord. So it seems to me we cannot calculate the area of that sector without using either that angle or something equivalent to an angle (eg an inverse trig function of a ratio of R- and L-related items).

If we can't calculate the sector area with those restrictions then we can't calculate the segment area either, since the difference between the two is just T.
Yeah that's the problem I'm running into - without the angle, it seems impossible. However, is there a solution possible using the sagitta.
 
If you can't do it without knowing the angle, then find the angle! If you draw a line from the center of the circle to the center of the chord, you have a right triangle with the length of the hypotenuse equal to the radius of the circle and "opposite side" equal to half the length of the chord: sin(\theta)= L/R. And the angle between the two radii is twice that.
 
You can start by thinking of how a function might look.
You know that if chord length C is equal to diameter D, then the area is that of half the circle. ##\frac{\pi}{8}D^2## and if C is zero, the area is zero. So you need a function of C that is defined on [0,D] with range on ##\left[0,\frac{\pi}{8}D^2\right]##.

As HallsofIvy mentioned, the ratio of C/D is equal to the sine of half the angle connecting the ends of the chord to the center. So the most natural solution would be one involving an inverse sine function to find the angle, taking the appropriate portion of the total area of the circle, then subtracting off the area of the triangle with base length C and height found by applying the Pythagorean theorem.

You say that you have a solution. Perhaps you could post the solution so we can better understand the method being suggested.
 
My understanding of the problem is that the approaches suggested in the last two posts are not allowed. That is, the solution is not allowed to calculate the angle along the way, either explicitly or implicitly ('You may not use angles').

Without that restriction, the problem is trivially simple.

I don't think using the sagitta can get around this restriction either, as the sagitta is a function of the cosine of the angle, so one has to do an inverse cosine operation to get something useable.

I'd be interested to know where this problem comes from, as it seems a very strange (and probably impossible) question.
 
Good find, RUber! Here's the conclusion of that linked thread:

linked thread said:
My professor asked if it could be done, and if so, show how, for homework.

In class he revealed that it can't. So we were "trolled" in that we spent a lot of time on it because we figured that professors don't usually ask these if it really can't be done.

I think the question from the professor in the linked thread is fair enough - and not trolling, as he asked if it could be done, thereby hinting at the possibility that it couldn't. If the question asked in this instance was worded exactly as in the OP, then I think that is indeed an inappropriate question from the teacher, as it is asked in a way that implies it can be done, which is misleading. But perhaps it has been inaccurately transcribed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RUber

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K