Area Of The Surface Of Revolution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the surface area of a surface of revolution, specifically using the formula for rotation about the x-axis. Participants explore the application of the formula and the implications of their calculations, including the handling of absolute values in integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their use of the surface area formula and expresses confusion over obtaining a result of zero, suggesting a potential issue with their integration limits.
  • Another participant provides a detailed breakdown of the derivatives and integrals involved, pointing out that the square root of a squared term must account for absolute values, particularly when cosine is negative.
  • There is a suggestion to use symmetry in the integration process to simplify the calculation and ensure a positive result.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of using absolute value signs in the integral to correctly evaluate the surface area.
  • Several participants acknowledge mistakes in earlier expressions, particularly regarding the correct formulation of the y-coordinate in the equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to use absolute values in the integral and recognize mistakes in earlier calculations. However, there remains some uncertainty regarding the implications of these mistakes and how they affect the overall understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps related to the integration process and the handling of negative values in the context of the surface area calculation.

Mattofix
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
I have tried this question (http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/9539/scan0001pa1.png) a number of times and always use the formula

S = 2*pi*int( y*sqrt( (dx/dt)^2+(dy/dt)^2 ) dt

i always get S=6*pi*a^2[1/5*(sin t)^5] 0<t<pi, and because sin 0 = 0 and sin pi = 0 the answer i get is 0. If you were to replace the y in the equation with x then i get the correct answer but that would not be the formula for rotation about the x-axis.

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
x= a cos3(t), y= a sin3(t) so x'= 3a cos2(t)sin(t) and y'= a sin2(t)cos(t). x'2+ y'2= 9a2 cos4(t)sin2(t)+ 9a2 sin4(t)cos2(t). Factoring out 9a2 cos2(t)sin2(t) leaves cos2(t)+ sin2(t)= 1.
[tex]\sqrt{x'^2+ y'^2}= \sqrt{9a^2 cos^2(t)sin^2(t)}= 3a cos(t)sin(t)[/tex]
[tex]y\sqrt{x'^2+ y'^2= 3a^2 cos(t)sin^2(t)[/tex]
After substitution, I get
[tex]6\pi a^2\int_{-\pi}^{pi}(sin^2(t)cos(t)) dt[/tex]

You are right- the substitution u= sin(t) gives u= 0 at both points.

Aha! I think I see the problem. cos(t), for t> [itex]\pi/2[/itex], is negative. The square root of cos2(t) is NOT cos(t) for t> [itex]\pi/2[/itex]! More generally, [itex]\sqrt{x^2}= |x|[/itex], not x.

Use symmetry. integrate from 0 to [itex]\pi/2[/itex]. That will give you a positive value. Because the integral from 0 to [itex]\pi[/itex] is 0, the integral from [itex]\pi/2[/itex] to [itex]pi[/itex] must be the negative of that (you can, if you wish, integrate and see). The true value of the integral from 0 to [itex]\pi[/itex], using absolute value, must be twice the integral from 0 to [itex]\pi/2[/itex]. And, of course, the actual surface area, the integral from [itex]-\pi[/itex] to [itex]\pi[/itex], is 4 times the integral from 0 to [itex]\pi/2[/itex].
 
Hmm..we should use absolute value signs here!

Thereby, we get the integral:
[tex]6a^{2}\pi\int_{0}^{\pi}\sin^{4}(t)|\cos(t)|dt[/tex]
where I have utilized that sin(t) is positive on the entire interval.

EDIT:
Okay, Halls found the flaw as well..:smile:
 
I just type faster!
 
Thanks guys, i totally understand it now :smile:
 
I'm glad YOU do!
 
and you dont...? how come?
 
Last edited:
I think Halls is flabbergasted as to why he forgot the absolute value sign in the first place!

Besides, in his expression, he mistakenly used y=asin(t), rather than the correct third power of sine in the y-expression.
 
Last edited:
arildno said:
Besides, in his expression, he mistakenly used y=asin(t), rather than the correct third power of sine in the y-expression.

... and that would keep on giving him the wrong answer therefore not understanding it?
 
  • #10
I think he was merely angered at himself for making a dumb mistake, that's all.
 
  • #11
Unfortunately, that happens a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K