MHB Area of Triangle ABC: Calculating with Points A,B,C

  • Thread starter Thread starter Petrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Triangle
Petrus
Messages
702
Reaction score
0
Hello MHB,
I am working with an old exam that I don't get same answer.
Line $$l_1(x,y,z)=(1,0,1)+t(2,-1,-2)$$ and $$l_2(x,y,z)=(2,-5,0)+s(-1,2,1)$$ intercept on point A also interpect on plane $$\pi:-x+2y-z+4=0$$ in point B and C, decide area of triangle ABC

Progress:
Point A:
If we equal them we get $$t=\frac{7}{3}$$ and $$s=-\frac{11}{3}$$ that means $$A=(\frac{17}{3},-\frac{7}{3},-\frac{8}{3})$$
Point B:
We replace $$x,y,z$$ in the plane with $$l_1$$ and get $$t=1$$
so $$B=(3,-1,-1)$$
Point C:
We replace $$x,y,z$$ in the plane with $$l_2$$ and get $$s=2$$ that means $$C=(0,-1,2)$$
Remember area of a triangle is half of the area of paralellogram that means
$$\text{Area}=\frac{1}{2}\left|\textbf{AB}\times \textbf{AC} \right|$$
and $$AB=(-\frac{8}{3},\frac{4}{3},-\frac{5}{3})$$
$$AC=(-\frac{17}{3},\frac{4}{3},\frac{14}{3})$$
so the area is $$\frac{\sqrt{45881}}{19}$$ which does not agree with the facit, what I am doing wrong?
edit: I forgot to say that cross product of AB x AC is $$(\frac{76}{9}, \frac{197}{9}, 4)$$

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To denote the area with vectors and their cross, I would use the $\LaTeX$ code:

$$\text{Area}=\frac{1}{2}\left|\textbf{AB}\times \textbf{AC} \right|$$

to get:

$$\text{Area}=\frac{1}{2}\left|\textbf{AB}\times \textbf{AC} \right|$$
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Back
Top