Area - Riemann Sum/Integration problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xcron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Riemann
Xcron
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
This problem is in the section of my book called "The Natural Logarithmic Function" so I am guessing that I would have to use a natural log somewhere...but anyways...the problem says:

For what values of [tex]m[/tex] do the line [tex]y=mx[/tex] and the curve [tex]y=\frac{x}{(x^2+1)}[/tex] enclose a region? Find the area of the region.

For some reason...I related this problem to an optimization problem because I thought if I could find the line with the greatest slope that is tangent to the curve, then I would know the values for which [tex]m[/tex] can be used with...but that didn't seem to use any natural logs or anything..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may be a good idea to find the intersection points. If there aren't any intersection points, there's no enclosed region.
It can also be useful to graph the problem for a few values of m, this gives you a better insight in the question.
 
Well, from graphing the problem...it seems like [tex]y=x[/tex] may be the right bound of the interval for which [tex]y=mx[/tex] and the curve enclose a region...but I would need to show a calculation for this...

I tried: [tex]mx= \frac{x}{(x^2+1)} m=\frac{1}{x^2+1}[/tex] but that only gives me the same equation of the curve or perhaps it gives me the equation for the bounds of the interval for which [tex]m[/tex] can be used with..

Seems like [tex]m[/tex] would belong to [tex][0,1)[/tex]...
 
I think you're on the right track:

[tex]m = \frac{1}<br /> {{x^2 + 1}} \Leftrightarrow m\left( {x^2 + 1} \right) = 1 \Leftrightarrow mx^2 + m - 1 = 0[/tex]

Now, solving this would give the intersection points (which you'll be needing for you integration limits, I assume), but for the moment we're only interested in when there are solutions (i.e. when they intersect and thus enclose a region). You can express this by saying that the discriminant of this quadratic equation in x has to be positive, this will give a condition on m.
 
Ahh...well, sorry to say this but I am still somewhat confused as to how that equation would be solved...two variables...need to solve for [tex]m[/tex] but that would just give us [tex]\frac{1}{x^2+1}[/tex] ... hmmm...
 
For the the straight line [tex]y=mx[/tex] and the curve [tex]y=\frac{x}{x^2+1}[/tex] to enclose some finite region, there should be atleast 2 points of intersection.
One point is (0,0). To find the other points, you need to solve
[tex]mx^2 + m -1 =0[/tex].
So for what values of 'm' does a solution to the above equation exist? That will give you the values of 'm' for which a region is enclosed.
To find the area, find the points of intersection in terms of 'm'. You don't need to solve for both the variables, you only need to find x in terms of 'm'.
 
Ohhhhhh, now I understand. I had understood the part about the 2 points of intersection but was trying to figure out which variable we solve that equation for and I now realize that we find the point on the curve using the intersecting line...which is why we solve for the x in terms of m. I got it, hehe.

so to continue...I would then continue to do:
[tex]\int_{0}^{\sqrt{\frac{1-m}{m}}} (\frac{x}{x^2+1}-mx)dx[/tex]

Is this right?..m would also be a constant, right?
 
Last edited:
Yeah, that is almost right. What about the other point of intersection (ie, [itex]-\sqrt\frac{1-m}{m}[/itex]? so the area will be twice your integral.
 
With:
[tex]mx^2 + m -1 =0[/tex]

How can I solve for m?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K