Area under a curve: Finding the bounded area using integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter lionely
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Curve
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the area bounded by the curve y = x² - x - 2 and the x-axis from x = -2 to x = 3. Participants are attempting to reconcile their calculations with the expected results, which leads to differing interpretations of how to account for areas above and below the x-axis.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share their integration attempts and results, noting discrepancies between their calculations and the book's answers. There is a focus on the interpretation of "bounded by the x-axis" and whether to treat areas below the x-axis as negative or positive.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest that the area should be treated as positive, while others argue for a signed area approach. There is no explicit consensus, but various perspectives on the problem are being articulated.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the problem statement regarding the treatment of areas below the x-axis, leading to confusion about the limits of integration and the nature of the area being calculated.

lionely
Messages
574
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the area bounded by the curve y= x2-x-2 and the x-axis
from x=-2 and x=3.
The attempt at a solution

I integrated from x=-2 to x=3 using (x^3/3)-(x^2/2)-2x and I got -4 5/6
but the answer is -4 1/2 .

I don't really see where I went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your answer.
 
Good News! You're both wrong.

Did you try checking your math again?
 
I still get - 4 5/6 :S
 
What I originally meant was the book answer is also wrong.

Remember, the integral is F(3) - F(-2)
 
When I do that I get -4 5/6!
((3)^3/3)- (9/2)- 2(3) - [(-2)^3/3) - (2) - 2(-2)]
 
You guys are all wrong. Look carefully that he said it's also bounded by the x-axis. You guys are counting the NEGATIVE area under the x-axis which you are not supposed to. The area is

##\displaystyle\int\limits_{-2}^{-1} x^2 - x - 2\ dx + \int\limits_{1}^{3} x^2 - x - 2\ dx = 5/2##
 
5/2? really? The answer in the book is that far off?
 
Sorry, a mistake in the limits. It's actually:

##\displaystyle\int\limits_{-2}^{-1} x^2 - x - 2\ dx + \int\limits_{2}^{3} x^2 - x - 2\ dx = 11/3##

See here for a better understanding: http://i.imgur.com/U8iWBwJ.png
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
I agree with your answer.
I don't. How is the answer not -5/6 ?
 
  • #11
Karnage1993 said:
Sorry, a mistake in the limits. It's actually:

##\displaystyle\int\limits_{-2}^{-1} x^2 - x - 2\ dx + \int\limits_{2}^{3} x^2 - x - 2\ dx = 11/3##

See here for a better understanding: http://i.imgur.com/U8iWBwJ.png

but shouldn't the 2nd integral be from -2 to 3?
 
  • #12
Why is that? You don't want to count the negative area, do you?
 
  • #13
Oh I see what you did.. so the answer in my book is 100% wrong. so it's 11/3? oh and may I ask what program you used to produce that sketch?
 
  • #14
Actually, thinking about it some more, I realized that you would count the negative area. It says bounded by the curve and x-axis and not above the x axis. So yes, the area would be -5/6.

That particular diagram was from Mathematica 8, but I'm sure you can make one using WolframAlpha.
 
  • #15
Karnage1993 said:
You guys are all wrong. Look carefully that he said it's also bounded by the x-axis. You guys are counting the NEGATIVE area under the x-axis which you are not supposed to. The area is

##\displaystyle\int\limits_{-2}^{-1} x^2 - x - 2\ dx + \int\limits_{1}^{3} x^2 - x - 2\ dx = 5/2##
It's one of those awkward 'areas':smile:. I was always taught to treat area under the x-axis as negative. This gives the right result in most practical circumstances, e.g. distance advanced when y=velocity, x=time.
If you want to count all areas as positive then it becomes ##\int_{-2}^3|x^2-x-2|dx##. I see no basis for simply ignoring the area below the axis. May well have gone wrong in the arithmetic somewhere, but I make that 49/6.
 
  • #16
:S so confused like 3 different answers.
 
  • #17
oay said:
I don't. How is the answer not -5/6 ?
Yes, -5/6, thanks.
 
  • #18
I'm confused I don't see how you guys got -5/6 =/
 
  • #19
lionely said:
I'm confused I don't see how you guys got -5/6 =/
It's about interpreting the question.

The area bounded by the curve and the x-axis, if you count below as negative, is -5/6 by a simple integral from -2 to 3.

If you count the area below the x-axis as positive too, then the answer is 49/6, by integrating between -2 to -1, -1 to 2, and 2 to 3, summing the absolute values of each.

If you discount any area below the x-axis altogether (bizarre if you ask me), then you just integrate between -2 to -1 and 2 to 3, giving 11/3.
 
  • #20
oay said:
I don't. How is the answer not -5/6 ?
That's an impossible answer. Area is always positive.
From x= -2 to x= -1, the graph is above the x-axis. The integral is positive so that area is just the integral from -2 to -1. From x= -1 to x= 2, the graph is below the x-axis. The integral is negative so that area is the negative of the integral from -1 to 2. Finally, from x= 2 to x= 3, the graph is above the x-axis. The integral is positive so the area is equal to the integral from 2 to 3.

The area bounded by the x-axis, the graph of [itex]y= x^2- x- 2[/itex], and the vertical lines x= -2 and x= 3, is given by
[tex]\int_{-2}^{-1} x^2- x- 2 dx- \int_{-1}^{2} x^2- x- 2 dx+ \int_{2}^{3} x^2- x- 2 dx[/tex]
 

Attachments

  • area.jpg
    area.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 465
  • #21
HallsofIvy said:
That's an impossible answer. Area is always positive.
From x= -2 to x= -1, the graph is above the x-axis. The integral is positive so that area is just the integral from -2 to -1. From x= -1 to x= 2, the graph is below the x-axis. The integral is negative so that area is the negative of the integral from -1 to 2. Finally, from x= 2 to x= 3, the graph is above the x-axis. The integral is positive so the area is equal to the integral from 2 to 3.

The area bounded by the x-axis, the graph of [itex]y= x^2- x- 2[/itex], and the vertical lines x= -2 and x= 3, is given by
[tex]\int_{-2}^{-1} x^2- x- 2 dx- \int_{-1}^{2} x^2- x- 2 dx+ \int_{2}^{3} x^2- x- 2 dx[/tex]
Which is what I said.
 
  • #22
HallsofIvy said:
Area is always positive.
Not so. As I mentioned, there are several applications where it is appropriate to treat it as signed. In electrostatics, an area element is a vector; outwards from a closed region is taken as positive, inwards negative.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K