Can Artificial Wombs Pave the Way to Immortality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fredreload
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of artificial wombs and their potential implications for fetal development and immortality. Participants explore the scientific basis of current research on extrauterine incubation, its historical context, and the ethical considerations surrounding its application in humans.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Ethical considerations

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express interest in the connection between artificial wombs and immortality, though acknowledging that the science is not yet established.
  • One participant highlights that current research on extrauterine incubation is aimed at studying fetal development and assisting premature pregnancies, rather than creating fully functional artificial wombs.
  • There is mention of historical attempts at fetal incubation dating back to the 60s, with a noted decline in success rates in more recent studies.
  • Participants discuss the potential reasons for discrepancies in survival rates between older and newer incubation systems, including differences in experimental approaches and levels of prematurity.
  • Concerns are raised about the current limitations of developmental biology and the challenges in engineering fetal development processes artificially.
  • Some participants speculate on the future applications of this technology, such as artificial surrogacy, while questioning its prioritization in medical research funding.
  • Ethical concerns are discussed, particularly regarding the implications of incubating human fetuses and the potential impact on abortion laws.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the feasibility or ethical implications of artificial womb technology. Some agree on the scientific challenges, while others emphasize the ethical dilemmas that may arise.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the underdevelopment of current technologies and the need for further research to understand fetal development processes. There is also mention of the limited funding available for such projects compared to other medical research areas.

fredreload
Messages
250
Reaction score
6
So I'm here mostly for the poll, but [Mod note: Conspiracy site link removed] is the article. I've been interested in combining this with immortality really, but since it's not a established science I'll just go with artificial womb for now.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The site that you linked to is a conspiracy theory site, it is not a credible resource. What it is referring to in this case is extrauterine incubation of fetal goats, something that was first attempted back in the 80s, a search on pubmed brings up a few other recent examples (it's interesting to note that the more modern experiments reported shorter success rates than the former). It's important to note that these aren't artificial wombs in the science fiction sense, the aim of this research is to allow for easier study of fetal development and, as a long term goal, help develop incubators that could help premature pregnancies by incubating the fetus outside of the womb. A womb is still needed to develop the fetus up to a point, and as those papers show the technology is very under developed with fetuses currently only survive a matter of days.

I'll allow your thread to stay open to either discuss the technical aspects of this research or the medical ethics of its potential use in humans but please keep the discussion to real science, not speculative fiction.
 
Interesting to see that newer incubation system is actually not as potent older ones, is my poll not allowed?
 
If you read through the links you might find an answer to why the older ones were reported as having better times, though looking at the references of the second paper I'm in error: this research dates back to the 60s, not the 80s. As for why the discrepancy as far as I can tell (and I've not read the papers thoroughly, just done a quick read) it's not covered but it may be due to the more modern paper trying a different system to explore its advantages, or it could be the level of prematurity. Incidentally a second pubmed search turned up a paper from early this year that is reporting survival times of one week.

The poll was removed as it is not relevant to the technical discussion.
 
I think they are pushing the age of the embryo to an earlier state like you mentioned, level of prematurity. It doesn't seem like a hot topic though, maybe our medical advancement haven't reached that stage?
 
No it hasn't. Developmental biology is a huge area of research, I've not dipped into it since my undergraduate thesis but it doesn't surprise me that we're still in the dark over exactly what processes need to happen during fetal development (and how to engineer them artificially). There's also a question of need, there's a finite amount of funding in the world for a much larger number of proposed projects. Funding bodies assign funding on the basis of which projects would better advance that bodies goal (be it cancer research, Alzheimer's etc) and those bodies get greater private/public donations on the basis of how much people care about the condition.

This technology would help very premature births. Pushed a hell of a lot further it might allow a form of artificial surrogacy for those who can't get pregnant. Worthy goals sure, but are they close to priorities?
 
Once it works for the goat it should pretty much work for any other mammals theoretically, but there is still the ethical concern. I wonder how many years it would take for it to become ethical.
 
Don't be so sure of that, a staggering number of therapies and techniques are developed that work fine in animals but do not work for humans. As for becoming ethical there are two issues I see that this technology would create; the first is a minor one which is the ethics of proving that it works on humans. Taking a fetus and trying to incubate it runs the risk that the fetus will survive but be disabled in some way. Second issue is what this technology would mean for abortion laws which in many countries are restricted to the date in which the fetus can survive independent of the mother.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K