Artinian rings are noetherian, why does this make sense?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Artinian rings are indeed Noetherian, which is a direct consequence of the Akizuki–Hopkins–Levitzki theorem. The discussion highlights the need for an independent proof and an intuitive understanding of this relationship. Participants express confusion regarding the standard proof, indicating that a clearer explanation or alternative proof would be beneficial for comprehension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Artinian rings
  • Familiarity with Noetherian rings
  • Knowledge of the Akizuki–Hopkins–Levitzki theorem
  • Basic concepts of ring theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research independent proofs of the relationship between Artinian and Noetherian rings
  • Study the Akizuki–Hopkins–Levitzki theorem in detail
  • Explore intuitive explanations for ring properties in algebra
  • Examine examples of Artinian and Noetherian rings to solidify understanding
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone studying ring theory who seeks to deepen their understanding of the properties of Artinian and Noetherian rings.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
Can somebody explain why this shouldn't surprise me? Apparently it's a corollary of the Akizuki–Hopkins–Levitzki theorem but the proof of that theorem isn't helping me really understand what's going on.
 
Nope. The problem is that the standard proof for why artinian rings are noetherian is a corolarry to a theorem that is beyond me at this point; I'm looking for both an independent proof and an intuitive understanding.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K