Associative, Commutative, and Distributive Laws for Congruence Classes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that addition and multiplication of congruence classes of integers exhibit associative, commutative, and distributive properties. Participants confirm that these properties are derived from the inherent characteristics of integers. The proof involves demonstrating that for any integers \(x\) and \(y\), the equality \(\overline{a} + \overline{b} = \overline{b} + \overline{a}\) holds true, utilizing set definitions and properties of integer addition. The approach emphasizes the necessity of formal proof despite the intuitive nature of the properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of congruence classes in modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with the properties of integers (associativity, commutativity, distributivity)
  • Basic knowledge of set theory and set inclusion
  • Ability to work with mathematical notation and proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definitions of congruence classes in modular arithmetic
  • Learn how to prove properties of operations on sets
  • Explore examples of congruence classes with different moduli
  • Investigate the implications of these properties in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory, particularly those studying modular arithmetic and its properties.

bologna121121
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are supposed to prove that the addition and multiplication of congruence classes for integers are associative, commutative, and distributive.


Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


To me, it seems like this would just be trivial as all these properties follow from the fact that we are working with integers, and integers are associative, commutative, and distributive (with both addition and multiplication). Am I on the right track here? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bologna121121 said:
To me, it seems like this would just be trivial as all these properties follow from the fact that we are working with integers, and integers are associative, commutative, and distributive (with both addition and multiplication). Am I on the right track here? Thanks.
It is fairly trivial, but you still need to show it. A congruence class of integers is not the same thing as an integer. What do you have so far?
 
I think I have the idea of what to do, but just to be sure I'll try the commutative addition one.

The addition is commutative if \overline{a} + \overline{b} = \overline{b} + \overline{a}

This is the same condition as x + y = y + x for all x \in \overline{a} and all y \in \overline{b} where a,b,x,y are all integers.

Thus, because for any integers x and y, x + y = y + x (commutativity of integers under addition) we would have \overline{a} + \overline{b} = \overline{b} + \overline{a}

Is this more or less the correct approach to take here?
 
That's more or less right. If you want to be more formal, you might start from the definitions:
$$\overline{a} + \overline{b} = \{x + y : x \in \overline{a}, y \in \overline{b}\}$$
$$\overline{b} + \overline{a} = \{y + x : x \in \overline{a}, y \in \overline{b}\}$$
To show equality of two sets, we show that each contains the other, i.e. ##\overline{a} + \overline{b} \subseteq \overline{b} + \overline{a}## and ##\overline{b} + \overline{a} \subseteq \overline{a} + \overline{b}##. To show the first inclusion, take an arbitrary element of ##\overline{a} + \overline{b}##. By definition, it is of the form ##x + y## with ##x \in \overline{a}## and ##y \in \overline{b}##. By commutativity of integer addition, ##x + y = y + x##, and the right hand side is clearly an element of ##\overline{b} + \overline{a}##. The reverse inclusion is similar.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K