I Assuming nonlocal realism: What message would signal convey?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the implications of Bell's inequalities and the nature of quantum mechanics (QM), particularly regarding realism and locality. It explores the concept of predetermined measurement outcomes in entangled particles and questions the necessity of signaling between them if outcomes are predetermined. Participants debate the interpretations of non-local realism and local non-realism, emphasizing that hidden variables can exist without superluminal communication. The conversation highlights the complexities of entanglement and the challenges in reconciling different interpretations of quantum theory, ultimately underscoring that both non-local realistic and local non-realistic theories have their proponents and unresolved questions. The discussion reflects the ongoing struggle to understand the fundamental nature of reality as described by quantum mechanics.
  • #31
DrChinese said:
Why would that be significant to the physics in this case?
I consider that a legitimate question. I am not allowed to respond to that for I haven't got a rigorous theory about it, and probably never will have.

DrChinese said:
Seems like that would be common to any experiment ever.
I was aiming at measurements on entangled systems.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
12K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K