Astrophysics after Aerospace Engineering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between astrophysics and astronomy, as well as the feasibility and value of transitioning from a background in aerospace engineering to studying astrophysics. Participants explore definitions, educational pathways, and the relevance of aerospace engineering skills in astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether astrophysics is the same as astronomy and seeks clarification on the value of studying astrophysics after aerospace engineering.
  • Another participant asserts that astrophysics and astronomy are generally considered synonymous, citing a definition from Google.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that astronomy is a sub-branch of astrophysics, with astronomy focusing on experimental aspects while astrophysics encompasses both experimental and theoretical problems.
  • One participant provides insights on the educational requirements for astrophysics, noting that undergraduate programs typically require core physics classes and that graduate programs vary significantly. They emphasize the importance of physics training for competitiveness in the job market.
  • This participant also mentions that aerospace engineers can contribute to astrophysics by assisting in the design and construction of instruments, although they may lack the extensive physics training typically required for astronomy.
  • They suggest that if the individual can take additional classes to obtain a physics or astronomy degree, it would be beneficial, but also note the necessity of demonstrating physics competence through exams and recommendations if pursuing astrophysics without a formal degree in the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and distinctions between astrophysics and astronomy, as well as the educational pathways from aerospace engineering to astrophysics. There is no consensus on whether the transition is straightforward or what the implications of such a transition might be.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in educational programs and the potential need for additional coursework or examinations to transition effectively into astrophysics from aerospace engineering. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the specific requirements and the nature of the relationship between the two fields.

PhysMaster
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Firstly, what is astrophysics exactly? Is it the same as astronomy?
Also, can I study astrophysics after studying aerospace engineering?
If so, is it worthwhile? or I just get simply two kinds of degrees?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All I can tell you is yes, astrophysics and astronomy are generally considered to refer to the same thing. The first definition Google gives for astronomy is in fact "the branch of physics that studies celestial bodies and the universe as a whole."
 
I tend to think of astronomy as a sub-branch of astrophysics. Astronomy refers only to experimental astrophysics while astrophysics refers to both experimental and theoretical problems dealing with celestial bodies and the universe.

~Lyuokdea
 
Here's my take on the astronomy/astrophysics distinction:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=121921"

Nowadays, astronomy/astrophysics really is just a branch of physics. In most undergraduate programs, you're expected to take all of the core physics classes and some of the advanced ones. There's a lot of variation in the graduate programs, but to really be competitive on the job market, you'll usually need to go to one that gives you a lot of training in physics.

The training you'll get as an aerospace engineer, although often very technical, likely wouldn't involve as much physics as you'd need for astronomy. However, astrophysics departments will often hire aerospace engineers to help them build and design their instruments. There are some astronomy faculty members that are primarily instrumentalists, but they usually have astronomy or physics degrees.

If you're still at the point where you can take some extra classes and get a physics/astronomy degree (would need at least two years, I think), then sure, go for it. It's a leap, but not a ridiculous one. If you don't have time to get a physics/astronomy degree, then you would need to demonstrate physics competence by performing well on the physics GREs. Good recommendations (emphasizing your quantitative abilities) are key as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K