At the atomic level, why is voltage added when batteries are connected in series?

AI Thread Summary
When two batteries are connected in series, the positive terminal of one battery connects to the negative terminal of another, creating an electric field that facilitates current flow and charge redistribution. This process equalizes the potential at the connection point, while the unconnected terminals maintain a voltage difference equal to the sum of both batteries' voltages. The absence of a salt bridge at the connection point allows for this potential equalization without charge buildup. Despite the lack of a direct salt bridge, ions still flow momentarily within each battery to balance the charge, contributing to the overall voltage increase. Understanding this interaction at the atomic level involves recognizing the role of electric fields and charge carriers in maintaining equilibrium across the cells.
shldon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Need help understanding how exactly from an atomic perspective voltage is added in batteries connected in series.
What exactly occurs at the atomic level when two batteries/galvanic cells are connected in series, resulting in their voltages being added together? I have a rough idea of what happens, but I can't really find a good resource that talks about it in detail.

I know that when you connect the positive terminal of one battery with the negative of another, the electric field will create a current which redistributes the charges so that the terminals connected together will be at the same potential, and the other two unconnected terminals will have a difference of potential equal to the sum of the voltage of both batteries. I think that the reason the connected terminals equalize in potential is due to the absence of a salt bridge (or something similar) at the connection point to prevent the charge buildup.

I can't explain the sum of voltages part though. But I think even though there isn't a salt bridge or equivalent at the connection point, the batteries still have their respective salt bridges and ions still flow momentarily when the batteries are initially connected to equalize the potential at the connection point. But this causes the ends to have a greater potential difference across them. But I'm not sure because wouldn't that shift the equilibrium at both ends?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I like to think about half-cells. Start on the attached reference...it is pretty succinct.
 
  • Informative
Likes DaveE and berkeman
shldon said:
the electric field will create a current which redistributes the charges

This is already hardly at the atomic level, more like your standard macro Physics101.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top