At the atomic level, why is voltage added when batteries are connected in series?

AI Thread Summary
When two batteries are connected in series, the positive terminal of one battery connects to the negative terminal of another, creating an electric field that facilitates current flow and charge redistribution. This process equalizes the potential at the connection point, while the unconnected terminals maintain a voltage difference equal to the sum of both batteries' voltages. The absence of a salt bridge at the connection point allows for this potential equalization without charge buildup. Despite the lack of a direct salt bridge, ions still flow momentarily within each battery to balance the charge, contributing to the overall voltage increase. Understanding this interaction at the atomic level involves recognizing the role of electric fields and charge carriers in maintaining equilibrium across the cells.
shldon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Need help understanding how exactly from an atomic perspective voltage is added in batteries connected in series.
What exactly occurs at the atomic level when two batteries/galvanic cells are connected in series, resulting in their voltages being added together? I have a rough idea of what happens, but I can't really find a good resource that talks about it in detail.

I know that when you connect the positive terminal of one battery with the negative of another, the electric field will create a current which redistributes the charges so that the terminals connected together will be at the same potential, and the other two unconnected terminals will have a difference of potential equal to the sum of the voltage of both batteries. I think that the reason the connected terminals equalize in potential is due to the absence of a salt bridge (or something similar) at the connection point to prevent the charge buildup.

I can't explain the sum of voltages part though. But I think even though there isn't a salt bridge or equivalent at the connection point, the batteries still have their respective salt bridges and ions still flow momentarily when the batteries are initially connected to equalize the potential at the connection point. But this causes the ends to have a greater potential difference across them. But I'm not sure because wouldn't that shift the equilibrium at both ends?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I like to think about half-cells. Start on the attached reference...it is pretty succinct.
 
  • Informative
Likes DaveE and berkeman
shldon said:
the electric field will create a current which redistributes the charges

This is already hardly at the atomic level, more like your standard macro Physics101.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top