At what pressure / capacity does co-generation become viable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rollingstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacity Pressure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the viability of co-generation systems using a back pressure turbine in an industrial setting, particularly focusing on the transition from 20 bar steam to 10 bar steam for electricity generation. Participants explore the feasibility, potential modifications to existing systems, and the economic implications of such setups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the viability of a back pressure turbine at lower pressures and suggests using the pressure drop to generate electricity.
  • Another participant proposes modifying the boiler to operate at 10 bar to reduce power consumption, questioning the need for a turbine.
  • Some participants note that co-generation typically involves generating power directly with an engine and utilizing waste heat to produce steam, rather than using steam solely for both heat and power.
  • There is a suggestion to estimate power output based on back pressure and to size a generator accordingly, considering economic factors.
  • One participant raises the possibility of using a non-condensing steam turbine for high-pressure steam needs in process plants.
  • Questions are posed about the parameters of the existing system, including why the boiler cannot simply be adjusted to operate at 10 bar.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of calculations to determine potential energy recovery and economic benefits, asking for specific parameters to assist in these calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to utilize the existing boiler and steam system for co-generation. There is no consensus on whether to modify the boiler or to implement a back pressure turbine, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal method for energy recovery.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding steam conditions, efficiency, and economic calculations, indicating that specific parameters are necessary for accurate assessments. The discussion highlights the complexity of integrating co-generation into existing systems.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in industrial energy systems, co-generation technologies, and those involved in optimizing steam processes may find this discussion relevant.

rollingstein
Messages
644
Reaction score
16
We have a boiler (industrial) that produces steam at ~20 bar but our process requirements all need less than 10 bars. I was wondering if at these relatively low pressures a back pressure turbine is viable at all? To use the 10 bar drop in pressure to generate some electricity.

Our boiler size isn't huge but not tiny either. Approx. 20 MMBtu.

With rising electric costs it'd be nice if we could generate a fraction of our electrical load ourselves. Our total peak electrical power draw is about 300 kVA.

Any opinions / comments are welcome.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Wouldn't it be easier to modify boiler itself, ie set 10bar valve, to make it consume less power?
Or your boiler uses different source of heat? Than it may be the good idea. I'm wondering, why steam engine power generators not in common use, it's very simple and may be fueled with coal or woods.
 
From what I've seen, Cogen isn't done by making one source of steam and making heat and power from it, it is done by making power directly with an engine and using the waste heat to make the steam.
 
You could possibly estimate the power output based on the back pressure, then account for losses and see how much kW it would output. Then you could size a generator based on it, calculate costs and see if it is economical enough.

We have a turbine on the plant which runs a compressor and a generator. The generator produces about 10 MW.
 
russ_watters said:
From what I've seen, Cogen isn't done by making one source of steam and making heat and power from it, it is done by making power directly with an engine and using the waste heat to make the steam.

You mean a turbine followed by a waste heat boiler? That's one way, yes.

But I think there are other ways especially for process plants where a need for some high pressure steam may exist. Essentially this would be a non condensing steam turbine I suppose.
 
Reheating, economisers??
 
Maybe I'm just misunderstanding the parameters here. You have an existing boiler that runs at 20 bar and a process that needs 10 bar. Are you just looking for a way to turn the 20 bar steam into 10 bar steam while recovering energy instead of losing it in a pressure reducing station? Stupid question: why can't you just turn the boiler down to 10 bar?
 
I'd agree with rock.freak. It would probably be worth doing some quick calculations to determine the potential energy recovery and economic benefit. Given your turbine inlet conditions (20 bar, ? temperature) assume 80% isentropic efficiency and find the power output of a turbine at the given flow rate. Next, determine the outlet conditions on the turbine. If the steam is saturated, can you use it at 10 bar or do you need to heat it further? Note that some water could condense depending on how hot your steam goes into the turbine.

Now you know what you would need to do to recover the energy from 20 to 10 bar and how much power you can get. That power has some value. Compare how much value that power has to the capital cost needed to recover it. Consider you may need to recover that cost over 10 years. How much money is that?

If you need help with those calculations, please provide:
Temperature of 20 bar steam
Temperature needed at 10 bar
Mass flow rate of steam
 
And 10 Bar load (and therefore what the excess capacity is).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
12K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
29K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K