Atmospheric pressure and water pressure - Boyle's law

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Boyle's Law in the context of atmospheric and water pressure, particularly focusing on the pressure changes experienced by a gas bubble as it rises in water. Participants are exploring the relationship between pressure, volume, and depth in a fluid environment.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the implications of Boyle's Law, questioning the relationship between pressure and volume as a gas bubble rises. There are attempts to derive expressions for pressure at different depths and how these relate to the volume of gas.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants clarifying their understanding of pressure calculations and the application of the ideal gas law. Some participants have provided guidance on the relationships between pressures at different points and the implications for volume changes.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a marking scheme that may have inaccuracies regarding pressure attribution, and assumptions about constant temperature are noted. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the correct interpretation of pressure contributions from water and atmospheric sources.

laser
Messages
104
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
See Below
Relevant Equations
PV=constant, P_{fluid} = rho*g*h
image.png


I am a bit confused on the marking scheme as attached above.

P1V1 is a constant by Boyle's Law. If the volume increases by a factor of 3, then the pressure decreases by a factor of 3.

This means that the pressure at the top is 1/3 the pressure at the bottom, right? The pressure at the top is just atmospheric pressure (1E5 Pa), so the pressure at the bottom must be (3E5 Pa). 3E5 = Pressure due to water + Pressure due to air, so pressure due to water is just 2E5. So 2E5 = rho*g*h.

Is there a flaw in my understanding? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pressure at the bottom is ##p_{\text{bot.}}=p_{\text{atm.}}+\rho g h## and the temperature (assumed constant) is ##T##. What is the initial volume according to the ideal gas law?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
kuruman said:
The pressure at the bottom is ##p_{\text{bot.}}=p_{\text{atm.}}+\rho g h## and the temperature (assumed constant) is ##T##. What is the initial volume according to the ideal gas law?
I'm not sure what you are asking me.
 
I am asking you, if the pressure of the gas in the bubble matches the pressure at the bottom of the lake which is ##p_{\text{bot.}}=p_{\text{atm.}}+\rho g h## and the ideal gas law says ##pV=nRT##, find an expression for the volume of the gas at the bottom. That's the volume that triples when the bubble rises to the surface.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
kuruman said:
I am asking you, if the pressure of the gas in the bubble matches the pressure at the bottom of the lake which is ##p_{\text{bot.}}=p_{\text{atm.}}+\rho g h## and the ideal gas law says ##pV=nRT##, find an expression for the volume of the gas at the bottom. That's the volume that triples when the bubble rises to the surface.
image (1).png

Is this what you mean?
 
laser said:
View attachment 344858
I am a bit confused on the marking scheme as attached above.

P1V1 is a constant by Boyle's Law. If the volume increases by a factor of 3, then the pressure decreases by a factor of 3.

This means that the pressure at the top is 1/3 the pressure at the bottom, right? The pressure at the top is just atmospheric pressure (1E5 Pa), so the pressure at the bottom must be (3E5 Pa). 3E5 = Pressure due to water + Pressure due to air, so pressure due to water is just 2E5. So 2E5 = rho*g*h.

Is there a flaw in my understanding? Thanks!
No flaw. You are correct. The marking scheme incorrectly attributes the entire 3atm pressure to the water, which is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, MatinSAR and laser
laser said:
View attachment 344861
Is this what you mean?
Yes. I see now that you had this result in post #1 when you wrote down
"So 2E5 = rho*g*h."
There is no flaw in your understanding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, MatinSAR and laser

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K