Atomic clocks: day – night speed variations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Alvydas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Clocks Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential speed variations of stationary atomic clocks placed on the equator during day and night, particularly in relation to gravitational effects from the Sun. Participants explore the feasibility of measuring these variations and the implications of different experimental setups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the speed variations depend on the frame of reference, noting that relative to an observer on Earth, there are no variations, while relative to the motion of the Sun, Lorentz time dilation could be applied.
  • There is a proposal to measure these variations by placing a precise clock far outside the Solar System, with pulsars mentioned as potential reference points, although challenges in tracking pulsars are acknowledged.
  • One participant emphasizes the gravitational clock dilation due to the Sun's influence, suggesting that clocks might run slower during the day when the Earth is closer to the Sun, raising the question of whether this effect is measurable.
  • Another participant provides an order of magnitude calculation for gravitational effects, indicating that while the differences are measurable, other factors like non-circular orbits and variable velocities may overshadow the day/night variations.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for different gravitational effects during day and night, with one viewpoint suggesting that night may experience greater dilation due to vector considerations.
  • Concerns are raised about the worthiness of testing certain hypotheses, questioning how to determine which experiments are valuable to pursue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the existence and measurability of speed variations in atomic clocks due to gravitational effects from the Sun, with no consensus reached on the best experimental approach or the significance of the variations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the assumptions made about gravitational effects, the dependence on definitions of frame of reference, and the influence of other celestial bodies on clock measurements.

Alvydas
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Hello.
How big is day – night speed variations for stationary atomic clock placed somewhere on equator?
And what experiment can measure such variations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on frame of reference. Relative to observer on Earth, there are no variations. Relative to the motion of the Sun, just use the Lorentz time dilation formula.

To measure these, you need to place a very precise clock far outside Solar System. There might be some pulsars out there that could work.
 
K^2 said:
Depends on frame of reference. Relative to observer on Earth, there are no variations. Relative to the motion of the Sun, just use the Lorentz time dilation formula.

To measure these, you need to place a very precise clock far outside Solar System. There might be some pulsars out there that could work.

Yes, pulsars. I forget about them.
But the problem could be that after rotation we see an other part of the Sky.
I mean would be difficult to see the same pulsar.

My question is targeting more to gravitational clock dilation due Sun's influence.
At day time we are closer to the Sun.
Therefore as I understand clock could go slower a bit (due bigger Sun's gravitational potential).
Is this measurable?

But we may also try to place the clock on a satellite at Geostationary orbit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_orbit

Now we would have much bigger variations of Sun's gravitational potential.
But stationary placed clock on the Earth can be much better quality.

So which setup would be more realistic to detect clock's variations due variations of Sun's gravity.
Lets say we compare clock's rate with pulsar.
 
Alvydas said:
Yes, pulsars. I forget about them.
But the problem could be that after rotation we see an other part of the Sky.
I mean would be difficult to see the same pulsar.

My question is targeting more to gravitational clock dilation due Sun's influence.
At day time we are closer to the Sun.
Therefore as I understand clock could go slower a bit (due bigger Sun's gravitational potential).

The Earth is 5 million km closer to the sun in januari, then in july. On an average day the Earth gets about 28000 km closer or further away, so this is larger effect on most days.
 
Just to give an order of magnitude: t ~ [itex]\sqrt{1-\frac{r_0}{r}} \approx 1-\frac{r_0}{2r}[/itex] with the Schwarzschild radius r0 (3km for our sun) and the distance r. Putting 1 astronomical unit in the formula, you get 2*10^(-8). But this is relative to the interstellar area - the difference between "1 AU" and "1 AU + 100000km" (a bit above the geostationary orbit) is just 1.3*10^(-11). Enough to be measurable with precise atomic clocks, but I would expect that a lot of other effects (non-circular orbits due to moon/sun/earth, variable velocity relative to other objects) are more important. For day/night on earth, the difference is one order of magnitude smaller. In addition to the things willem2 mentioned, the Earth is moving around the center of mass of the earth/moon system - this is smaller than the day/night difference, but it is comparable.
 
mfb said:
Just to give an order of magnitude: t ~ [itex]\sqrt{1-\frac{r_0}{r}} \approx 1-\frac{r_0}{2r}[/itex] with the Schwarzschild radius r0 (3km for our sun) and the distance r. Putting 1 astronomical unit in the formula, you get 2*10^(-8). But this is relative to the interstellar area - the difference between "1 AU" and "1 AU + 100000km" (a bit above the geostationary orbit) is just 1.3*10^(-11). Enough to be measurable with precise atomic clocks, but I would expect that a lot of other effects (non-circular orbits due to moon/sun/earth, variable velocity relative to other objects) are more important. For day/night on earth, the difference is one order of magnitude smaller. In addition to the things willem2 mentioned, the Earth is moving around the center of mass of the earth/moon system - this is smaller than the day/night difference, but it is comparable.

For the case of not so strong gravity your formula can be transformed to
t = t0*(1+Φ/c^2)
And this is well tested for one body case.
However I do not know any experiment which would test it for two bodies
when clocks is between these two bodies.
Something like (Earth) (clock)...(Sun) - day version
compare to opposite (clock)(Earth)...(Sun) – night version (which can be seen like 1 body case).

Yes the case mentioned by willem2 must be accounted too.

In terms of differences this is worth to test,
because there is another viewpoint which predict bigger dilation for night than day.
Because here is used vectors instead of Φ and the sum of these vectors becomes smaller for day version (because these vectors have opposite directions)

Of course you may say it is not worth to test,
but in this case would be very interesting to know how you determinate which experiment is worth to test, and which is not ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
999
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K