Attraction and repulsion of e- and p+

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter delplace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Attraction Repulsion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of attraction and repulsion between electrons (e-) and positrons (p+), exploring whether electrical charge is the sole explanation for these interactions. Participants delve into related phenomena such as degenerate matter, the Pauli exclusion principle, and the conditions in neutron stars, with a focus on theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that electrical charge is not the only explanation for attraction and repulsion, suggesting the Pauli exclusion principle could also contribute to a repulsive force.
  • There is a request for clarification on degenerate matter, with references to external resources for further reading.
  • One participant asserts that in degenerate matter, such as in white dwarfs, electrons do not attract but rather experience repulsion due to the Pauli principle.
  • Another participant questions the relationship between high pressures and temperatures in neutron stars and the conditions in ITER experiments.
  • Some participants discuss the transition from white dwarfs to neutron stars and black holes, emphasizing the role of gravity and degeneracy pressure.
  • There are claims about the basic nature of degenerate matter in quantum physics, with challenges posed regarding the understanding of these concepts among participants.
  • Discussions also touch on the nature of professional expertise and civility in scientific discourse, with some participants expressing frustration over perceived lack of knowledge or professionalism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the role of electrical charge and the Pauli exclusion principle in explaining attraction and repulsion. There is no consensus on the interpretations of degenerate matter or the implications for neutron stars and black holes.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various external sources for definitions and explanations, indicating that some assumptions about prior knowledge may not be shared among all participants. The discussion also highlights the complexity of astrophysical phenomena and the challenges in measuring and modeling them.

  • #31
FastFreddy said:
Actually, I asked for civility. But I finally figured out what is really wrong with this website. The monitors are closeminded. They will censor anything they can't figure out in 30 seconds.


Some of the mentors ARE professional physicists and can smell crackpot and non-serious theories in 10seconds. They are not closeminded par se, it is just a matter of containing order. The purpose of this forum is to educate and discuss contemporary physics - not discussing our own non-serious pet theories.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
malawi_glenn said:
If you want to consult a professional physicists, go to your local university - they will answer - do you think we have time for this ****? Come back when you at least know 90% of current research.

I think you forgot to add your smiley face to that comment.
 
  • #33
conway said:
I think you forgot to add your smiley face to that comment.

why, he is just as the rest of the members in the crackpotter leauge.
He blaims the mentors for beeing closeminded and that they censor everytihng they don't understand in 30seconds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K