Attraction between a charge and a magnet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the interaction between a positively charged metal sphere and a compass, where both ends of the compass were attracted to the sphere. The attraction is attributed to the movement of electrons in the compass, indicating an electric interaction rather than a magnetic one. The material of the sphere, whether steel or iron, is significant as it could influence the compass's behavior, especially if it induces a magnetic field. The conversation also touches on the effects of a changing magnetic field on charges in conductors and the implications of the compass's orientation during the experiment. Overall, the experiment raises questions about the nature of magnetic and electric interactions in charged systems.
DRC12
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
In physics lab we positively charged a metal sphere then placed a compass near it and both ends of the compass were attracted to the sphere. I know magnetic fields are created by electrons, so I made the assumption the compass is attracted to the positive charge because the electrons in the compass are attracted to the positive charge thus the interaction is purely electric. I'm not sure if magnets are negatively charged thou. Is this the basic idea? Or does it have to do with the interactions between magnets and electric charges?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Was the metal sphere made of steel or iron?
 
You should have repeated the experiment with an unmagentized needle ;)
How would you determine if the compass needle carried a net charge?

Anyway - assuming you cannot do more experiments before you need to hand in your report for this one, you can assume the compass needle had a neutral charge (but you should state that assumption in the report). It is also a metal - a conductor.

Before you start thinking in terms of charges on the compass needle - what determined which pole was attracted to the charge? Something about the way you positioned the compass? Since neither pole was favored - what does that tell you about the magnetic field about the charged object?

Now back to considering charges...
What happens when a neutral conductor is brought close to a charged object?
(You've probably seen the effect in an electroscope - but what causes it?)
 
First, so no-one gets angry at more for posting homework in the non-homework section, this isn't for a report I'm just trying to figure out what was going on. The magnetic field on the charged object is unaffected by which end of the compass is closest to it. Because the compass is a conductor, when it's brought near the charge the electrons gather towards the positive charge creating a force on the needle to go towards the charge. So this means it doesn't matter whether the charge was positive or negative, because if it was negative the electrons in the compass would have moved as far from the charge as possible i.e 180 degrees from the charge.
 
Another small question, does a magnetic field have an effect on a charged object that is not magnetic? and vice-versa
 
DRC12 said:
Another small question, does a magnetic field have an effect on a charged object that is not magnetic? and vice-versa
Perceptive question - a changing magnetic field will affect the charges in a conductor. When you bring the compass needle close, you are changing the magnetic field at the charged sphere.

This is why I asked you about what determined which pole was attracted and why (probably) @technicion asked if the metal sphere was iron or steel.
 
Yes...it would be interesting to know what the charged sphere was made of.
If it was iron or steel then the compass needle would be attracted even if the sphere was not charged
 
Simon Bridge said:
Perceptive question - a changing magnetic field will affect the charges in a conductor. When you bring the compass needle close, you are changing the magnetic field at the charged sphere.
But if the compass is still then the magnetic field isn't changing is it? The compass was brought towards the charged object and then held there.

technician said:
If it was iron or steel then the compass needle would be attracted even if the sphere was not charged
Because the magnet would induce a magnetic field in these metals? and all the lab manual says is that the sphere was conducting
 
DRC12 said:
But if the compass is still then the magnetic field isn't changing is it? The compass was brought towards the charged object and then held there.
That's right - but the effect of the motion can still result in a deflection of the needle.
If the compass was oriented so the north pole was initially closer to the charged sphere but the south pole ended up attracted to the sphere, then there could have been an induction effect.
Because the magnet would induce a magnetic field in these metals? and all the lab manual says is that the sphere was conducting
... so if this was a long-answer in an exam, you'd do well to mention the possibility that the conducting sphere has some iron in it.

You should be able to see that quite a lot of things could have been happening.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Well thanks a lot there's clear's things up
 
  • #11
That's the fun part of asking scientists about something - you end up with more answer than you bargained for :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top