Attraction of two spheres in deep space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational attraction between two solid lead spheres in deep space, specifically examining the force when the distance between their centers is altered. The original poster presents a scenario involving two spheres with a specified mass and radius, questioning the calculated gravitational force at a given distance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the inverse square relationship of gravitational force with distance and explore the implications of tripling the distance. There are questions regarding the initial calculations and the values used, particularly the distance between the centers and the gravitational constant.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the calculations and assumptions made regarding the distances involved. Some participants express confusion over the provided numbers and their implications, while others suggest using ratios to analyze the problem. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the accuracy of the initial force calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in the interpretation of the distance between the spheres, as the radius is mentioned alongside the distance between centers. There is a concern about the plausibility of the given gravitational force based on the provided parameters.

Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A solid led sphere of radius 10m has a mass of about 57 million kg. If two of these spheres are floating in deep space with their centers 20m apart, the gravitational attraction between them is only 540N. How large would this gravitational force be if the distance between the centers was tripled?


Homework Equations


F=ma
W=mg
Gm1m2 / d^2



The Attempt at a Solution



This is starting to piss me off.

(G x 57,000,000^2) / 40^2 ≠ 540. It's not even close!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravitational force is, as your formula shows, inversely proportional to the square of the distance. If the distance between centers is tripled, the force is multiplied by 1/9.

(where did you get the "40" in the denominator? The given distance between centers is 20 m, not 40. And what did you use for "G".)
 
Feodalherren said:
Gm1m2 / d^2
Use ratios. Compare F1 when the distance = d1 to F2 when the distance = d2 = 3d1.
 
The distance between the spheres was given as 20 but their radius was given as 10m, which makes the distance between the centers a total of 40m. It's still not even close.

Did they pull these numbers out of their a-holes or something!?
 
Feodalherren said:
The distance between the spheres was given as 20 but their radius was given as 10m, which makes the distance between the centers a total of 40m.
You are told that their centers are 20m apart.
 
Woops, you're right. That makes the number even less plausible... Could you calculate it and see if you get 540N?
I must be doing something wrong I get a HUGE number.
 
Feodalherren said:
Woops, you're right. That makes the number even less plausible... Could you calculate it and see if you get 540N?
I must be doing something wrong I get a HUGE number.
Use ratios. If the distance doubles, for example, does the force get bigger or smaller? By what factor?

I will check their numbers out to see if that quoted force makes sense, but you do not need to do that to answer the question.
Edit: Their numbers work out just fine. For the given masses and distance, the force is about 540 N, just like they say.
 
I did use ratios and got 60N. What threw me off was their numbers. They make absolutely no sense.Why would they confuse students by just arbitrarily making up numbers when there's a very specific and easy way to get real numbers!?
 
Feodalherren said:
I did use ratios and got 60N.
Perfectly correct.
What threw me off was their numbers. They make absolutely no sense.Why would they confuse students by just arbitrarily making up numbers when there's a very specific and easy way to get real numbers!?
There's nothing wrong with their numbers. You must have made an error somewhere.
 
  • #10
Could you show me how you calculated it, please?

I'm having the same problem with a bunch of questions.
 
  • #11
Feodalherren said:
Could you show me how you calculated it, please?
You have the equation, just plug in the numbers. What did you use for G?
 
  • #12
G= 6.67 x 10^-11

So what I did was (G(57,000,000)^2) / 20^2
 
  • #13
Feodalherren said:
G= 6.67 x 10^-11
Good.
So what I did was (G(57,000,000)^2) / 20^2
Try it again. You can show your steps if you still can't get it to work.
 
  • #14
Actually this time it worked... I'm apparently not calculator savvy.

Thank you very much! Greatly appreciate the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
7K