Atwood Machine, I determining position of the masses.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an Atwood machine problem involving three masses (5m, 3m, and 4m) and their movements in relation to each other. Participants are exploring how to determine the distance the 4m mass moves based on the movements of the other two masses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the relationships between the distances moved by the masses and the resulting accelerations. Some are questioning how to account for the movement of the 4m mass when the other two masses move in opposite directions or by different amounts.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the accelerations of the masses and how they relate to each other. Some participants have offered calculations and reasoning, while others are questioning the validity of those approaches and suggesting that the problem should be considered holistically rather than in isolation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of different assumptions, such as the relevance of the 4m mass in determining the system's overall acceleration and the effects of treating the 5m and 3m masses as a combined entity.

chickenman444
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


6nz7s2.jpg

I know how to do this type of problem, I'm just confused as to how to determine the distance the (4m) mass goes up .


Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


So I was thinking that if mass (5m) and mass (3m) go in opposite directions then mass (4m) will remain where it is. If mass (5m) and mass (3m) both go down the same distance (x=y), then mass (4m) will go up x or y. But what if x≠y? I was tried to have both mass (5m) and mass (3m) go down so that mass (4m) can go up. I figured if mass (5m) goes down by -2x, then mass (3m) goes up by 2x = y which would still have mass (4m) where it is. So then I thought about moving mass (5m) down another -4x so in total -6x but also have mass (3m) go down -4x = -y so then mass (4m) goes up 4x. I don't know if that makes sense, but this whole thing is confusing me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the 5m goes down h relative to the pulley, then the 3m goes up h relative to it.
If the pulley goes down by d then x=d+h, y=d-h, and 4m goes up by d.
 
I solved this question like;

Let's say 5m mass has traveled "X" distance(downward).Firstly, we need to calculate the acceleration of 5m and 3m masses.

$$ 5mg- 3mg = 8m . a => 2mg= 8m . a => a = \frac {g}{4} $$

and for the rope tension passes over 3m mass $$ F_{T} - 3mg = 3m.\frac {g}{4} = > F_{T}=\frac {15mg}{4}$$

and for the rope tension passes over the right pulley $$ 2. F_{T} = \frac {15mg}{2}$$ which exerts to 4m mass (upward)

Now if we consider acceleration for the 4m mass; $$ \frac {15mg}{2} - 4mg = 4m . a => a = \frac {7g}{8}$$

Okay now we know the acceleration of 4m mass and if we know how much time did the 5m spend for "x" distance. We can know the distance 4m traveled in this time interval.

For the time; $$ X= \frac {1}{2}at^2$$ => $$a_{5m} = \frac {g}{4}(m/s^2)$$ $$t = \sqrt{\frac {8X}{g}}$$

In this time interval 4m mass should have traveled ;

$$ X_{4m} = \frac {1}{2}at^2$$ => $$X=\frac {1}{2}\frac {7g}{8}.[\sqrt{\frac{8X}{g}}]^2$$ and we get $$ X_{4m} = \frac {7X}{2} $$

$$\frac{7X}{2}$$ is the distance that 4m has traveled in terms of x.

I don't know if I'm correct.
 
mastermechanic said:
Firstly, we need to calculate the acceleration of 5m and 3m masses.
You cannot do that in isolation. The 4m mass is relevant. E.g., if we set that to zero then the 5 and the 3 will both have acceleration g.
 
haruspex said:
You cannot do that in isolation. The 4m mass is relevant. E.g., if we set that to zero then the 5 and the 3 will both have acceleration g.

Then, can we do $$ 8mg-4mg = 12m. a $$ $$ a = \frac{g}{3}$$ which is whole system's acceleration and also as I've found $$ a_{5m} = \frac {g}{4}$$.
So sum of accelerations $$a_{5m}= \frac {7g}{12}$$ and we do this $$ X= \frac {1}{2}at^2$$ again. Is it possible?
 
mastermechanic said:
whole system's acceleration
Different parts have different accelerations, so you need to define what you mean by that.
mastermechanic said:
##a_{5m} = \frac {g}{4}##​
Why? And is that the acceleration in the lab frame or relative to the accelerating pulley?
 
haruspex said:
Different parts have different accelerations, so you need to define what you mean by that.

Why? And is that the acceleration in the lab frame or relative to the accelerating pulley?

First, I've counted the 5m and 3m as a one mass. So 4m mass should go upward because of the force inequality.This movement will give the 5m&3m (which I counted as one mass) $$\frac {g}{3}$$ and both 5m and 3m mass has $$\frac {g}{3}$$ and now if we consider the 5m&3m as separate they also have addional acceleration $$\frac {g}{4}$$ which you've asked. And all I've done is adding up these two accelaration.
 
mastermechanic said:
I've counted the 5m and 3m as a one mass. So 4m mass should go upward because of the force inequality.
mastermechanic said:
if we consider the 5m&3m as separate they also have addional acceleration
You are still making the same mistake. You cannot partition the problem like that.
Consider e.g. making the 3m zero. According to your method, the 4m should accelerate upwards at (5-4)/(5+4)g = g/9; but clearly it would accelerate downwards at g.

There is one sure way to approach rigid body problems: consider the forces and acceleration of each body separately. Relate them by forces that must correspond (action = -reaction) and by accelerations that must interrelate to preserve certain distances (lengths of strings, in this case).

Let the tension in the lower string be T.
  • What is the tension in the other string?
  • What is the relationship between the three accelerations, just based on strings staying the same length?
  • Write out the ΣF=ma equation for each mass.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K