Atwood's Machine: Understanding Acceleration and Tension

  • Thread starter Thread starter FScheuer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the dynamics of an Atwood machine with three masses: m, 2m, and 3m. The key equations derived include a1 = (mg + T)/m, a2 = (2mg + 2T)/2m, and a3 = (3mg + T)/3m, leading to accelerations of -1/5mg for the first two masses and 3/5mg for the third. The tension in the string remains constant due to the assumption of massless pulleys and neglecting friction. A critical insight is the need to express the total string length as a function of the displacements to solve for the system's accelerations accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams
  • Knowledge of tension in strings and its implications in pulley systems
  • Ability to differentiate functions and apply constraints in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion for Atwood machines
  • Learn about constraints in mechanical systems and their mathematical representations
  • Explore the implications of tension in multi-mass pulley systems
  • Review differentiation techniques in the context of physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in classical mechanics, particularly in understanding the dynamics of pulley systems and forces acting on multiple masses.

FScheuer

Homework Statement



There is an Atwood machine (image attached) with 3 masses, m, 2m, and 3m.

Homework Equations



What is the acceleration of each mass?

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I’m not quite sure where to start here. I know that there is a gravitational force downward on each mass, mg, 2mg, and 3mg respectively. I also know that tension is pulling each of the masses upward. I think I would be able to begin solving the problem if I understood how the force of tension in the string was applied to each mass. Is the force of tension on each mass different?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0719.jpg
    IMG_0719.jpg
    2.9 KB · Views: 574
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can neglect friction and the pulleys are massless, the tension is the same in the entire string. What you need to do is to start making free body diagrams to your heart's delight. You will also need a constraint to keep the string length constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
Orodruin said:
If you can neglect friction and the pulleys are massless, the tension is the same in the entire string. What you need to do is to start making free body diagrams to your heart's delight. You will also need a constraint to keep the string length constant.
I set it all up and got .5g upward for the acceleration of the first two masses and .5g downward for the acceleration of the third. Does that seem correct?
 
FScheuer said:
I set it all up and got .5g upward for the acceleration of the first two masses and .5g downward for the acceleration of the third. Does that seem correct?
With those numbers, the string is getting longer at 1g. The first three lengths each get shorter at .5g while the last gets longer at .5g.
Please post your working.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
haruspex said:
With those numbers, the string is getting longer at 1g. The first three lengths each get shorter at .5g while the last gets longer at .5g.
Please post your working.
I set up three equations for the accelerations.

a1 = (mg + T)/m

a2 = (2mg + 2T)/2m

a3 = (3mg + T)/3m

I’m not quite sure how to use the constant string length as a constraint. Before I set a1 equal to a3 but I now realize that they are not necessarily equal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FScheuer said:
I’m not quite sure how to use the constant string length as a constraint.
Write the total string length as a function of the displacement of the pulleys and differentiate it twice.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
Orodruin said:
Write the total string length as a function of the displacement of the pulleys and differentiate it twice.
What exactly do you mean by that? Isn’t the total string length constant?
 
FScheuer said:
What exactly do you mean by that? Isn’t the total string length constant?

Yes. But it can also be expressed in terms of the displacements. This is the entire point. What happens when you differentiate a constant? What do you get out when you differentiate the displacements twice?

Since you have only three equations and four variables (the accelerations and the tension), you need this additional condition to solve the system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
Express the length of string (aside from the parts in contact with the pulley) as ##L=L_1+2L_2+L_3##. Differentiate this twice with respect to time to get a relationship between the accelerations of the three masses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #10
Orodruin said:
Yes. But it can also be expressed in terms of the displacements. This is the entire point. What happens when you differentiate a constant? What do you get out when you differentiate the displacements twice?

Since you have only three equations and four variables (the accelerations and the tension), you need this additional condition to solve the system.
I added the equation and then solved to get -1/5mg for the first two masses, and 3/5mg for the third. This seems to match up with the answer I found online. Thanks.
 
  • #11
FScheuer said:
I added the equation and then solved to get -1/5mg for the first two masses, and 3/5mg for the third. This seems to match up with the answer I found online. Thanks.
It is also the same result as I got (assuming that you define the positive direction to be down for all masses, which agrees with your sign for the gravitational term in post #5, but note that you have defined ##T## to be negative of the tension in the string as positive ##T## in those equations would lead to the tension accelerating the masses downwards too - of course this does not matter for the solution if you only solve for the accelerations, but it will matter if you are interested in the string tension).
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K