harjunmaa
- 5
- 1
Falsified vaccines are not uncommon, as far as I know. How do they know a vaccine is authentic at a vaccination site that has no laboratory?
Can you provide a reference for that?harjunmaa said:Falsified vaccines are not uncommon, as far as I know.
By the distribution chain tracking I would imagine.harjunmaa said:How do they know a vaccine is authentic at a vaccination site that has no laboratory?
The question applies to any medicines, either administered at a medical centre or bought over the counter. How do you know what you're buying really is ibuprofen, for example?harjunmaa said:Falsified vaccines are not uncommon, as far as I know. How do they know a vaccine is authentic at a vaccination site that has no laboratory?
I think the important part of the question bears on the severity of the consequences.PeroK said:The question applies to any medicines, either administered at a medical centre or bought over the counter. How do you know what you're buying really is ibuprofen, for example?
You mean that fake medicine can only harm or kill you if it's a fake vaccine? Fake antibiotics, malaria tablets or painkillers are much safer?Tom.G said:I think the important part of the question bears on the severity of the consequences.
I was thinking in terms of ineffectiveness, which is at least, or perhaps more, likely.PeroK said:You mean that fake medicine can only harm or kill you if it's a fake vaccine? Fake antibiotics, malaria tablets or painkillers are much safer?
Are fake homeopathics safer or more dangerous than real ones?PeroK said:You mean that fake medicine can only harm or kill you if it's a fake vaccine? Fake antibiotics, malaria tablets or painkillers are much safer?
Per the pointedly snarky response above, in developed countries the way to ensure authenticity is to get the vaccine from reputable sources, just like you do any other medicine. Per your source, you shouldn't go to some random dude with a website to get the vaccine. This is the entire reason the FDA and other countries' equivalent agencies exist and should be fairly obvious.harjunmaa said:Falsified vaccines are not uncommon, as far as I know. How do they know a vaccine is authentic at a vaccination site that has no laboratory?
Huh? Why would they need to keep a low profile? No, I don't think we should. The issue of fake vaccines will be more of a problem as less developed countries start distributing the vaccine. And Russia.harjunmaa said:Here's a reference. Understandably, the people who work on this want to keep a low profile. Let's help them keep it that way.
Yes.russ_watters said:Are fake homeopathics safer or more dangerous than real ones?
While I agree in general (modulo the placebo effect), the better question is "why"? To cover their tracks? That only works until people start getting sick.hutchphd said:It would be difficult to replicate these responses with an inert surrogate.
What a watered down reply...Vanadium 50 said:Yes.
Vanadium 50 said:One can take the "why" another level - how does anyone make any money from this? If you're going to commit a crime, shouldn't there be a payoff? In the US, the federal government buys the vaccine directly from the manufacturer. Why would anybody buy counterfeit vaccine when they can get the real stuff for free?
Furthermore, how much is a dose? A few dollars. Why would someone want to go into the business of counterfeiting vaccine when they can get more money for less risk for counterfeiting Gucci handbags?
berkeman said:Can you provide a reference for that?
Supposing you find empty vials, it is easy to refill them with saline and sell shots at your shady clinic at $99 a shot.Vanadium 50 said:Yes.While I agree in general (modulo the placebo effect), the better question is "why"? To cover their tracks? That only works until people start getting sick.
One can take the "why" another level - how does anyone make any money from this? If you're going to commit a crime, shouldn't there be a payoff? In the US, the federal government buys the vaccine directly from the manufacturer. Why would anybody buy counterfeit vaccine when they can get the real stuff for free?
Furthermore, how much is a dose? A few dollars. Why would someone want to go into the business of counterfeiting vaccine when they can get more money for less risk for counterfeiting Gucci handbags?
Sorry, "you" form is passive, not implying that you have a shady clinic! Difficulties of the English language.harjunmaa said:Supposing you find empty vials, it is easy to refill them with saline and sell shots at your shady clinic at $99 a shot.
"you find" is not a likely scenario, unless you are a worker in the "Sharps Waste" chain. So I suppose you need to add in bribery and conspiracy to the scenario.harjunmaa said:Supposing you find empty vials, it is easy to refill them with saline and sell shots at your shady clinic at $99 a shot.
Syringes, Needles, and Empty Vaccine Vials
These items should be placed in an FDA-approved sharps container. These containers are made from rigid, puncture-proof plastic and prevent injury and spread of infectious waste. Never discard needles or other sharp objects in the trash or loose into the biohazardous waste box/container.
Disposal of sharps waste
Extreme care must be taken in the management and disposal of sharps waste. The goal in sharps waste management is to safely handle all materials until they can be properly disposed of. The final step in the disposal of sharps waste is to dispose of them in an autoclave. A less common approach is to incinerate them; typically only chemotherapy sharps waste is incinerated. Steps must be taken along the way to minimize the risk of injury from this material, while maximizing the amount of sharps material disposed.[citation needed] Strict hospital protocols and government regulations that instruct health care providers on how to manage sharps waste help ensure that the waste is handled as effectively and safely as possible.
Disposal methods vary by country and locale, but common methods of disposal are either by truck service or, in the United States, by disposal of sharps through the mail. Truck service involves trained personnel collecting sharps waste, and often medical waste, at the point of generation, and hauling it away by truck to a destruction facility. Similarly, the mail-back sharps disposal method allows generators to ship sharps waste to the disposal facility directly through the U.S. mail in specially designed and approved shipping containers. Mail-back sharps disposal allows waste generators to dispose of smaller amounts of sharps more economically than if they were to hire out a truck service. Recent[when?] legislation in France has stated that pharmaceutical companies supplying self injection medications are responsible for the disposal of spent needles. Previously popular needle clippers and caps are no longer acceptable as safety devices, and either sharps box or needle destruction devices are required.[citation needed]
Did you read what I wrote?harjunmaa said:Supposing you find empty vials, it is easy to refill them with saline and sell shots at your shady clinic at $99 a shot.
So this business is both illegal and unlikely to be profitable? Sign me up for a franchise!Vanadium 50 said:Why sell them at $99 at "your shady clinic" when you can get the real stuff for free?
Crime doesn't pay.russ_watters said:So this business is both illegal and unlikely to be profitable?
Exactly. There is zero incentive. Plus, at least in Aus, we have an audited trail that a clinic, hub etc., gets. I suppose someone could do it, but you are getting into the same territory as Feynman and Flying Saucers:Vanadium 50 said:Why sell them at $99 at "your shady clinic" when you can get the real stuff for free?
Have you really never been promised something for free only to find out later that it wasn’t? Is it really so inconceivable that a government or healthcare provider would be untrustworthy enough to engage in such a practice? If the government (or whoever) had previously lost your trust, would you really find it much of a stretch to believe that somehow they’ll eventually charge you for this vaccine that they claim is free?Vanadium 50 said:But I ask again - how does someone make money off a counterfeit if the real stuff is free?
I'm having trouble engaging my imagination sufficiently to understand what you are getting at, except for that last bit; No, the vaccine is bought and paid for, and that's it. "The government or whoever" can't go back and charge us more for it any more than a used car dealer can jack up the price of a car a week/month after you bought it.TeethWhitener said:Have you really never been promised something for free only to find out later that it wasn’t? Is it really so inconceivable that a government or healthcare provider would be untrustworthy enough to engage in such a practice? If the government (or whoever) had previously lost your trust, would you really find it much of a stretch to believe that somehow they’ll eventually charge you for this vaccine that they claim is free?
In developed nations, no. And while we don't know until we know, we can speculate what might happen in 3rd world countries. I suspect there are going to be significant problems, with hijackings, substitutions, magically multiplying supplies, etc. The UN, WHO, Red Cross, etc should probably be setting up their own clinics to combat that. Would you trust a dose of Pfizer vaccine administered to you by the government of Zimbabwe? Or CZS Pharmacy in Zimbabwe?Vanadium 50 said:But I ask again - how does someone make money off a counterfeit if the real stuff is free?
Well, I’ve supplied at least three links to news stories indicating that fraudulent vaccine scams are already happening. I’m not sure what else you want.russ_watters said:Unless you can point to a past occurrence or describe better what you are imagining.
Actually, there was a new claim you made, that I was questioning: you suggested it would be possible for the government and insurance companies to re-charge us for the vaccine we already bought and used.TeethWhitener said:Well, I’ve supplied at least three links to news stories indicating that fraudulent vaccine scams are already happening. I’m not sure what else you want.
It's fairly common for patients at hospitals to be promised that procedures would be covered by insurance only to be told after the fact that they owe much more than previously told because "out-of-network" doctors were used in the procedure. Some studies estimate that as many as one in five ER visits are subjected to surprise medical bills, and they affect millions of Americans per year. (note this practice was recently made illegal by congress, which will take effect in 2022).russ_watters said:Actually, there was a new claim you made, that I was questioning: you suggested it would be possible for the government and insurance companies to re-charge us for the vaccine we already bought and used.
To answer the quoted claim directly: No, I've never received(not "promised" -- I've/we've already received the vaccine) something that was free and then been charged for it.
This is an entirely different issue from fake vaccines/vaccine scams.
Totally understand that, but that's not the same situation. V50 provided the actual/final cost to him(his insurance company) that the insurance company actually paid/charged for the vaccine. What is being suggested (on the insurance company side) is akin to retracting that EOB and issuing a new one.Ygggdrasil said:It's fairly common for patients at hospitals to be promised that procedures would be covered by insurance only to be told after the fact that they owe much more than previously told because "out-of-network" doctors were used in the procedure.
I did not receive an EOB for my vaccines. The CDC seems to contradict it self on who pays:Vanadium 50 said:Oh, and I checked to see how much the vaccinatrix (is that a word?) billed my insurance company. $2.59 per dose.
I have a major insurance provider and provided that information to the vaccinatrix prior to getting the vaccine.The federal government is providing the vaccine free of charge to all people living in the United States, regardless of their immigration or health insurance status...
COVID-19 vaccination providers can:
- Seek appropriate reimbursement from the recipient’s plan or program (e.g., private health insurance, Medicare, Medicaid) for a vaccine administration fee
If they try, what are they going to do? Repossess my white blood cells?TeethWhitener said:would you really find it much of a stretch to believe that somehow they’ll eventually charge you for this vaccine that they claim is free?
No such thing.russ_watters said:the government of Zimbabwe
russ_watters said:If it is the insurance company paying, then it is being paid for by your premiums as opposed to your taxes (wonder which costs you more?)
If I were setting this up from the higher level of national government, I would want something that would be quick and easy to set (for reasons of pandemic emergency), would provide the institutions doing the injections with a reasonable reimbursement, and distribute that pay in a simple (for the government) manner.Vanadium 50 said:The vaccine is free. The drugstore is allowed to charge my health insurance (actually, my pharmaceutical insurance) for the shot itself. If some uninsured comes in, it's still free to them. I don't know who, if anyone, they charge.
I was thinking about that. Off the top of my head, I wasn't sure if it would or not.russ_watters said:Also, $2.59 seems unlikely. It would be hard to even pay the salaries of the stickers at that rate.
Vanadium 50 said:Neither of my vaccinatrices (is that really a word?) said they were nurses. One seemed too young to be a nurse. Possibly too young to drive. :)
Both of mine were at chain pharmacies. For the first there were two injection stations, a supervisor (who relieved one of the injectresses for a few minutes and acted as a "floater") and a greeter/card checker. For the second there was one injectress and a floater. Though also, someone at the pharmacy counter checked me in. At mass vaccination sites they likely do better than a 2:1 ratio.BillTre said:I was thinking about that. Off the top of my head, I wasn't sure if it would or not.
As far as I could tell, these not nurses, but something like a nursing assistant or trainee.
These are very easy injections to do. Intra Muscular in the arm. Can't miss that. Not easy to do harm.
Where I went, each injectee dealt with several people (greeters/informers/card checkers (probably a good fraction volunteer), someone telling the next person what station to go to, injector (sub-nurse in my experience), card filling out station/waiting area (probably had a nurse somewhere on site where I was (a central injection site)).
At each step there was one person dealing with the whole crowd, but there were maybe 10 sites doing the injections. So other than the injector labor, the accounting of labor of the other stations would be reduced by ~10.
In the drug store, its a single pharmasist, or a pharmacist aid, doing the injection at about 1/4 of the rate (my flu shot experience).
The people doing the injections may not get much of a wage, being low down on the health care hierarchy.
It might even be training situation. Learn how to deal with people, while you doing a really simple procedure and develop confidence and experience, but not getting much a wage.
However, I don't know what wages in healthcare are like for these kinds of employees.
Think Deficit Spending and the subsequent interest payments.russ_watters said:Actually, there was a new claim you made, that I was questioning: you suggested it would be possible for the government and insurance companies to re-charge us for the vaccine we already bought and used.
I've been. Those 10,000 are at least less likely to infect you with COVID than anyone else in the country. Beyond that? ...evidently the guy with the assault rifle near the ATM was on my side, even if the guy driving slowly past it may not have been.Vanadium 50 said:No such thing.
Zimbabwe has vaccinated 10,000 people. Zimbabwe being Zimbabwe, these are probably 10,000 people you don't want to mess with.
How do I know the government has paid for it? And even if I accept that the government has already paid for it -- paid whom?But suppose once they get going, people still want to push fake vaccine. You have exactly the same problem: the government has already paid for it, and you're competing with "free".
Ygggdrasil said:It's fairly common for patients at hospitals to be promised that procedures would be covered by insurance only to be told after the fact that they owe much more than previously told because "out-of-network" doctors were used in the procedure. Some studies estimate that as many as one in five ER visits are subjected to surprise medical bills, and they affect millions of Americans per year. (note this practice was recently made illegal by congress, which will take effect in 2022).
Vanadium 50 said:Neither of my vaccinatrices (is that really a word?) said they were nurses. One seemed too young to be a nurse. Possibly too young to drive. :)