Average Velocity vs Instaneous Velocity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of average velocity and instantaneous velocity, particularly in the context of a metal ball rolling down a ramp and transitioning to free fall. Participants explore the definitions and calculations of these velocities, as well as the implications of constant versus non-constant velocity in various scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether using the formula v = d/t calculates instantaneous velocity when the ball goes airborne, while others affirm this under the assumption of constant velocity.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of non-constant velocity, with one participant asking for clarification on why it affects the calculations of average and instantaneous velocity.
  • Participants debate the physical meaning of distance (d) in the equation v = d/t, particularly in cases of non-constant velocity.
  • Another participant introduces a hypothetical scenario involving a cup being grabbed while moving, raising questions about the velocity of the cup and the effects of momentum during the interaction.
  • Further questions arise regarding the time it takes for a body to reach the speed of a moving wheel, with suggestions that various physical principles may apply, including kinematics and momentum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of average and instantaneous velocity, but there is ongoing debate about the implications of non-constant velocity and the physical interpretation of distance in the equations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the complexities introduced by acceleration and momentum in different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about constant velocity and the definitions of distance versus displacement. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in applying equations under different conditions, particularly in non-constant scenarios.

rainstom07
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I just need some clarification.

In a lab that i did, a metal ball goes down a slanted ramp, onto a horizontal ramp of d distance, and then goes airborne (off the table). The instant the ball enters the horizontal ramp a timer is started, and - when it goes airborne - the timer is stopped. Thus, i have t time.

When i calculate using the formula [tex]v = d/t[/tex], i am calculating instantaneous velocity of the ball the instant it goes airborne correct?

When i consider where the ball goes onto the of horizontal ramp to be the zero point, i can say that the ball has displaced d distance, right? And using the same logic with the timer, i can say that the change in time is t time, correct? Thus i have Δd and Δt.

Using the formula [tex]v_{avg} = \Delta d/ \Delta t[/tex], yields me the average velocity correct?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi rainstom07! :wink:
rainstom07 said:
When i calculate using the formula [tex]v = d/t[/tex], i am calculating instantaneous velocity of the ball the instant it goes airborne correct?

yes :smile:

v = d/t is the instantanteous velocity from point 0 to point d

this only works because the velocity is (we assume) constant …

it would not work if, for example, there was friction
When i consider where the ball goes onto the of horizontal ramp to be the zero point, i can say that the ball has displaced d distance, right? And using the same logic with the timer, i can say that the change in time is t time, correct? Thus i have Δd and Δt.

Using the formula [tex]v_{avg} = \Delta d/ \Delta t[/tex], yields me the average velocity correct?

yes :smile:

(is there something that was bothering you about this?)
 
this only works because the velocity is (we assume) constant …

Can you explain why a non-constant velocity doesn't work? For instance, if the ball goes down the slanted ramp, i start the timer when it goes airborne and then stopped the timer when it hits the floor; thus, i obtain t seconds. I then measure the distance between the ramp and the floor; thus, i obtain the vertical d distance.

can i say that [tex]v_y = d_y/t[/tex] is the instantaneous velocity (y-component) of the ball the instant it hits the ground?

(is there something that was bothering you about this?)
I thought that if you consider the distance as d, then you cannot consider the distance as the Δd. The same goes with time.

Thanks for your help!
 
(write "itex" rather than "tex", and it won't keep starting a new line :wink:)
rainstom07 said:
[tex]v_y = d_y/t[/tex]

i'm confused :redface:

what's dy ? :confused:
 
The height (the distance between the ramp and the floor).
 
rainstom07 said:
can i say that [tex]v_y = d_y/t[/tex] is the instantaneous velocity (y-component) of the ball the instant it hits the ground?

no, the instantaneous velocity increases (ie the ball gets faster as it falls further)

dy/t is the average velocity, which is less than the final velocity :smile:
I thought that if you consider the distance as d, then you cannot consider the distance as the Δd. The same goes with time.

you can if the speed is constant

(but not otherwise)
 
So let me get this straight.

If you consider the distance as the Δd, then you cannot consider the distance as d for a non-constant velocity (i.e. there is acceleration)?

I guess this leads to a very interesting question (and probably the source of my confusion). In the equation [tex]v = d/t[/tex], what is the d stand for, physically? It surely cannot be the height; the height is Δd, right?
 
rainstom07 said:
In the equation [tex]v = d/t[/tex], what is the d stand for, physically?

it's really only a dimensional equation …

it reminds you that speed is distance per time :smile:

(as a real, useful, equation it only works when speed is constant :redface:)
 
:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:

so there's no physical manifestation of the d in the equation for a non-constant velocity? huh?
 
  • #10
d = ut + 1/2 at2 (constant acceleration)
 
  • #11
interesting,..but yea d stands for displacement which is different from distance..and the instantaneous time would be a derivative. if time wasnt constant

i got a question about velocity but i don't know if itll be alright to put it here so ill put it anyways
ok first imagine you are in a car as passenger moving at constant velocity relative to the ground. up ahead you see a cup sitiing on a table stationary ralative to the ground. as you get closer to the cup you stick your hand out to get it..when you pass by it you grab it but don't stop...then as soon as you get it you let it go so it falls as a projectile,..
my question is what is the velocity of the cup as soon as you grab it? myguess is that the cup is now in your reference frame and as soon as you grab it its moving at your speed. so the time it takes the cup to go from zero to my speed will be zero?or some small number..my other question is ,so it falls a greater distance from the point of letting go, will it make a difference how long you hang on to the cup ignoring air resistance or will it fall the same distance from the point of letting go? and will my speed stay constant or will i decelerate a litle?you know because of momentum? would it be like running over a fly i don't feel it but i slowed down a bit...many thanks for your time.
 
  • #12
hi uknew! :smile:
uknew said:
… what is the velocity of the cup as soon as you grab it? myguess is that the cup is now in your reference frame and as soon as you grab it its moving at your speed. so the time it takes the cup to go from zero to my speed will be zero?or some small number

some small number …

your hand is soft, so it will deform slightly, which takes time (and even the cup itself will deform very slightly … there's no such thing as a perfectly rigid object :wink:)
..my other question is ,so it falls a greater distance from the point of letting go, will it make a difference how long you hang on to the cup ignoring air resistance or will it fall the same distance from the point of letting go?

same distance
and will my speed stay constant or will i decelerate a litle?you know because of momentum? would it be like running over a fly i don't feel it but i slowed down a bit

conservation of momentum applies in every collision …

the cup gains momentum, so you-and-the-car lose momentum :smile:
 
  • #13
thanks tiny tim.
so say for example that a wheel is moving at speed of sound or some high number ( just pretend) and me being unbreakble and at rest grab onto the outer rim of the wheel, my body will accelerate to the speed of the wheel in a time t..if the wheel is moving at constant velocity when i grab it and continues at constant speed (if at all possible).. how can i calculate the time my body will reach the same speed as the wheel?will i use kinematics, impuse, momentum or change in momentum or change i energy? or all? how wouldi use impulse decipline?since ft=mv, what force would i use? if my only givens are my mass and speed of the wheel and mass of the wheeel.
 
  • #14
uknew said:
how can i calculate the time my body will reach the same speed as the wheel?will i use kinematics, impuse, momentum or change in momentum or change i energy? or all?

you would have to use the compressibility of the wheel and of your body
 
  • #15
interesting thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K