Babies grasp math before gift of gab: study

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fourier jr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Study
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Research conducted by Elizabeth Brannon and Kerry Jordan at Duke University reveals that seven-month-old babies can understand numerical concepts before they develop verbal communication skills. The study demonstrated that infants could match the number of voices they heard to the number of faces they saw, indicating an internal representation of numerical values. This finding suggests a shared numerical perception system between pre-verbal infants and non-verbal animals, challenging previous studies that yielded different results due to methodological flaws. The researchers aim to further investigate infants' and monkeys' perceptions of larger numbers to enhance early math education and explore the evolutionary roots of numerical ability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cognitive development in infants
  • Familiarity with experimental psychology methodologies
  • Knowledge of numerical cognition theories
  • Awareness of comparative studies between humans and non-verbal animals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of numerical cognition in infants
  • Explore methodologies in experimental psychology for studying perception
  • Investigate the evolutionary origins of numerical ability in humans and animals
  • Learn about effective early childhood math education techniques
USEFUL FOR

Child development researchers, educators in early childhood mathematics, psychologists studying cognitive processes, and anyone interested in the intersection of language and numerical understanding in infants.

fourier jr
Messages
764
Reaction score
13
Babies grasp math before gift of gab: study
Last Updated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:52:58 EST
CBC News
Babies can perceive the idea of numerical concepts even before they start talking, a new study suggests.

Researchers in North Carolina showed seven-month-olds could match the number of voices they heard to the number of faces they expected to see.

The same numerical perception in monkeys was identified by Elizabeth Brannon, a professor at Duke University's Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, and graduate student Kerry Jordan.

In experiments, babies listened to two or three women saying "look." Simultaneously, the babies could choose to look at video images of two or three women saying the word.

Like monkeys, babies spent more time looking at the image that matched the number of women talking, Brannon and Jordan report in this week's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"As a result of our experiments, we conclude that the babies are showing an internal representation of 'two-ness' or 'three-ness' that is separate from sensory modalities, and thus reflects an abstract internal process," Brannon said in a statement.

"These results support the idea that there is a shared system between pre-verbal infants and non-verbal animals for representing numbers."

Somehow, babies seem to quickly gain the ability to perceive numbers, she said.

Similar experiments by other researchers showed different results, but the setup of the studies could be to blame in three ways, according to Brannon:

-- Earlier studies used arbitrary stimuli such as drumbeats instead of "ecologically relevant stimuli."
-- Sounds were presented successively, which means the duration of the sequence could cause problems.
-- Babies were tested more than once, which could have given them the opportunity to learn something about the stimuli, such as associating the length of a drumbeat sequence with numbers.

The researchers' next step is to test babies and monkeys on their perceptions of larger numbers. The findings could help in testing methods for teaching basic math skills to the very young, and in exploring the evolutionary origins of numerical ability.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/science/national/2006/02/14/baby-math060214.html

i had a prof who wondered how much math humans know without any training, & for some reason i didn't think anyone would work on answering that question. anyway it might lead to some support for people who think math is discovered rather than created. i guess this result won't be incredibly surprising since (by legend anyway) gauss could calculate before he learned to talk. in james newman's "world of math" there's an article on the counting abilities of crows. apparently crows have a much greater ability to count, say, 9 or 10 random dots on a page just by glancing at it for a fraction of a second. humans can succesfully count only about half that amount. he also wondered how much logic humans are born with.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Very interesting article. If math is indeed "discovered", I feel though it would be less artistic than if it were created.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
18K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
16K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K