Stargazing Backyard astronomers, how do you decide what to look at?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick-stg
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Backyard astronomers often face challenges in deciding what to observe due to obstructions like trees and light pollution. Many users rely on software like Stellarium or Starry Night to plan their observations, although some prefer manual methods for a more hands-on experience. The discussion highlights the importance of local astronomical societies for guidance and shared experiences, especially during times when outdoor gatherings are limited. Observers also mention the appeal of bright celestial objects, such as Venus, and the need for patience and practice to improve their skills in locating targets. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the blend of technology and traditional methods in enhancing the stargazing experience.
  • #31
lomidrevo said:
or polarizing filter
I’m not so sure that the reduction in luminosity is great enough with polarisers . Iirc, my ND is 12% and even that’s pretty bright.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
I don't know much about these filters. I just checked out real quickly what is available and prices range from $40 for the polarizing filters to in excess of $300 for UHC filters. What's what, I assume that you get what you pay for, what's the benefit and what is the sweet spot? Or maybe this is a topic for a new thread?
 
  • #33
An ND filter need only cost a few quid. No need to go mad. 😉
 
  • #34
I have an ND96 moon filter. Is that going to help see faint nebulae?
 
  • #35
Nick-stg said:
I have an ND96 moon filter. Is that going to help see faint nebulae?

No, just the opposite.

A moon filter reduces the intensity of all wavelengths, including wavelengths typically emitted by nebulae. A moon filter is to be used when looking at the moon with you scope.

On the other hand, a UHC filter reduces the intensity of all wavelengths, except wavelengths typically emitted by nebulae, which get transmitted normally, i.e., backgound light is reduced much more than light from nebulae.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, russ_watters and lomidrevo
  • #36
George Jones said:
On the other hand, a UHC filter reduces the intensity of all wavelengths, except wavelengths typically emitted by nebulae,
That was my understanding. Thank you for confirming. But what about the h-alpha, h-beta, O-III etc.. based on their descriptions these appear to do the same thing as the UHC filters. What's the difference?
 
  • #37
Nick-stg said:
That was my understanding. Thank you for confirming. But what about the h-alpha, h-beta, O-III etc.. based on their descriptions these appear to do the same thing as the UHC filters. What's the difference?

While I have an 8-inch scope, I don't own any filters, and I am not much of a guide for them. Try

https://starizona.com/tutorial/narrowband-imaging/
 
  • Like
Likes Nick-stg
  • #38
sophiecentaur said:
I’m not so sure that the reduction in luminosity is great enough with polarisers . Iirc, my ND is 12% and even that’s pretty bright.
on the filter I got (Orion Variable Polarizing Filter), you can adjust the amount of light transmission from 1% to 40%. Very practical, as you can appreciate different transmission in case of full moon, and different one in case of observing Jupiter (I noticed that some very fine details can be enhaced by using the filter even with Jupiter).
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #39
Nick-stg said:
But what about the h-alpha, h-beta, O-III etc.. based on their descriptions these appear to do the same thing as the UHC filters. What's the difference?
Narrow-band vs broad band. Those that specifically identify an emission line block everything except that emission line. UHC filters have a broad band of what they let in and/or a narrow band of what they block (sodium-sulphur lines from street lights, for example). It's all described in the product details:

https://www.highpointscientific.com...AlF9u7D3DkxBz0fxXVsgV4eoO03C9h_caArNcEALw_wcB
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #40
lomidrevo said:
on the filter I got (Orion Variable Polarizing Filter), you can adjust the amount of light transmission from 1% to 40%. Very practical, as you can appreciate different transmission in case of full moon, and different one in case of observing Jupiter (I noticed that some very fine details can be enhaced by using the filter even with Jupiter).
I totally agree. I never bought those. Probably more expensive than an nd filter? I must admit that I was commenting on a straight photographic polar
 
  • #41
Nick-stg said:
That was my understanding. Thank you for confirming. But what about the h-alpha, h-beta, O-III etc.. based on their descriptions these appear to do the same thing as the UHC filters. What's the difference?
The UHC filter idea is a compromise between cutting out what you don't want to see (visually) and letting as much in that you do want. The resulting image is not quite as bright, of course but if you exclude nearby light sources and get light adapted, you can see a lot and the contrast is improved, of course. Astrophotography uses narrow band filters, for instance H-alpha (which will show you virtually nothing visually) and you use long exposure times (tracking and possibly guiding needed). Separate exposures with each filter produce a set of images which can be mixed to taste.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #42

Attachments

  • 1589589211988.png
    1589589211988.png
    116.8 KB · Views: 354
  • #43
chemisttree said:
I can’t believe the prices though
Annoying innit? But think of the man-hours in quality checking and the cost of low volume sales. Then realize that 'enthusiasts' in any field are suckers. At least you can measure the results here - unlike with the snake oil that goes into most HiFi equipment.
 
  • Like
Likes Nick-stg
  • #44
sophiecentaur said:
unlike with the snake oil that goes into most HiFi equipment.
Don't get me started on that one...
 

Similar threads

Stargazing Telescope or Binoculars for First Astronomy Device?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
How Do You Calculate the Correct Launch Window for an Inclined Orbit Around Io?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
How do you personally cope with stress?
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
How Do You Begin Your Journey to Becoming an Astronomer?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
The Scientist as Hero - or not
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Writing: Read Only What Does Great Lakes Earth Look Like from Space?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
What birds do you have at your place?
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
8K
Falsely accused: what would you do?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Kerbal Space Program - Rocket Design Basics
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236)
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K