Balanced Sequences and Optimal Routing

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhj23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the paper "Balanced Sequences and Optimal Routing" by Altman, Gaujal, and Hordijk (2000). Participants seek clarification on specific proofs, particularly Proposition 2.16 and Theorem 2.21, regarding inequalities involving sequence lengths. The discussion highlights confusion over the derivation of certain bounds and the application of results in practical scenarios, specifically in queuing networks. Users express a need for concrete applications of the theoretical concepts presented in the paper.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Balanced Sequences in combinatorial optimization
  • Familiarity with Optimal Routing principles in network theory
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs and inequalities
  • Basic concepts of queuing networks and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the proofs in "Balanced Sequences and Optimal Routing" for deeper comprehension
  • Explore applications of Balanced Sequences in queuing theory
  • Study the implications of Proposition 2.16 and Theorem 2.21 in network optimization
  • Investigate related literature on optimal routing strategies in computer networks
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, mathematicians, and network engineers interested in combinatorial optimization, queuing theory, and the practical applications of theoretical results in network routing.

rhj23
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I've been reading the paper on Balanced Sequences and Optimal Routing (Altman, Gaujal, Hordijk; 2000). However, there are a couple of proofs given that I don't quite follow. There are statements made that are assumed to trivially follow, but I can't see how and am hoping someone will be able to help me.

The first is in the proof of Proposition 2.16. The fact that l_i >= (n-1)l_1 + n is easily shown, but 'on the other hand' l_i <= n(l_1) - 3 does not seem to follow from any similar method.

The second is in the proof of Theorem 2.21, Step (2). Where does the fact that |s_1| >= max{4, 2(n+m)+1} come from. (Obviously the 4 is trivial, but I do not understand the 2(n+m)+1)

The paper is attached; I hope that someone with a better understanding than me will be able to follow the proofs and let me know where I'm missing something obvious!

Thanks
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
A question

Sorry not to provide any answer to your questions? But if you don't mind, I have a question about that paper on Balanced sequences and optimal routing. I have been looking for some particle applications of the results presented in that paper, but unfornately I havn't been abled to find a good one, so far. May be it is due to my lack of knowledge about queuing networks.
Therefore, I will be more than please, if you can provide me with an application, or any link or article where I will be able to find some.
Thanks.

ml7
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K